Resisting Moralisation in Health Promotion

Abstract

Health promotion efforts are commonly directed towards encouraging people to discard ‘unhealthy’ and adopt ‘healthy’ behaviours in order to tackle chronic disease. Typical targets for behaviour change interventions include diet, physical activity, smoking and alcohol consumption, sometimes described as ‘lifestyle behaviours.’ In this paper, I discuss how efforts to raise awareness of the impact of lifestyles on health, in seeking to communicate the (perceived) need for people to change their behaviour, can contribute to a climate of ‘healthism’ and promote the moralisation of people’s lifestyles. I begin by summarising recent trends in health promotion and introducing the notion of healthism, as described by Robert Crawford in the 1980s. One aspect of healthism is moralisation, which I outline (alongside the related term moralism) and suggest is facilitated by efforts to promote health via information provision and educational strategies. I propose that perceived responsibility plays a role in mediating the tendency to moralise about health and behaviour. Since I argue that states ought to avoid direct and indirect moralisation of people’s health-related behaviour, this suggests states must be cautious with regard to the use of responsibility-indicating interventions (including informational and educational campaigns) to promote health.

Passport to freedom? Immunity passports for COVID-19

“…Powerful social norms have quickly been established around the acceptability of leaving one's house during lockdown, travelling to work, meeting with others, coughing in public, and so on. Moralisation in the public health context is controversial, 54 but the stigmatisation of antisocial, risky behaviour might be justified in contexts where there is a clear risk of harm to others, and a moral obligation to refrain from exposing others to that risk. Such informal systems of punishment might be fostered by government messaging around COVID-19 in order to establish norms and encourage their enforcement.…”

Solidarity and Responsibility in Health Care

“…Friesen op cit), and of targeted moralisation, where an already less well-off, or vulnerable, minority are morally blamed for failing to maintain adequate health (e.g. Brown, 2018).…”

Ethical conflicts in patient-centred care

“…23 Critics have warned against an overzealous focus on health as "a kind of medicalisation, whereby domains of life previously not considered relevant to health, or as appropriately falling within the structures of healthcare, are newly seen through a medical lens". 24 Interventions that go beyond the traditional medical realm may well be justified, but their potential value should always be weighed against the risks of contributing ethical and clinical problems that tend to follow with extensions of medicine to previously non-medical areas of human life.…”