2018
DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resisting sexism and speciesism in the social sciences: Using feminist, species‐inclusive, visual methods to value the work of women and (other) animals

Abstract: Visual methods offer social scientists some promising possibilities for valuing the work of women and animals in domestic homes and formal organizations, such as schools, hospitals, residential care facilities and other workplaces. In this article, we consider how visual methods might be used to ‘put women and animals in the frame’. We draw data and inspiration from our What is it About Animals study [2015–2016], which involved an online call for people over 16 years of age, to post pictures, poems, stories an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe, record, speak and write and it is unsurprizing, therefore, that most usually what we find begs “the obvious question, where are the animals themselves in this research?” (Hamilton & Taylor, 2017, p. 2). Recent years have witnessed an emerging literature on multispecies ethnographies (Kirksey & Helmreich, 2010); that consider the involvement of animals alongside humans in a range of social practices (such as work, sport, farming, research, or companionship see Charles & Wolkowitz, 2019; Haraway, 2008; Bear et al., 2017; Taylor & Fraser, 2018). This has accompanied calls for methods better able to attend to human–animal relationships (van Dooren et al., 2016) and that attend to the “voice” of animal through visual and sonic data (Birke, 2014; Hamilton & Taylor, 2017).…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observe, record, speak and write and it is unsurprizing, therefore, that most usually what we find begs “the obvious question, where are the animals themselves in this research?” (Hamilton & Taylor, 2017, p. 2). Recent years have witnessed an emerging literature on multispecies ethnographies (Kirksey & Helmreich, 2010); that consider the involvement of animals alongside humans in a range of social practices (such as work, sport, farming, research, or companionship see Charles & Wolkowitz, 2019; Haraway, 2008; Bear et al., 2017; Taylor & Fraser, 2018). This has accompanied calls for methods better able to attend to human–animal relationships (van Dooren et al., 2016) and that attend to the “voice” of animal through visual and sonic data (Birke, 2014; Hamilton & Taylor, 2017).…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent literature review on service animals at work reveals the great importance of such animals, yet finds that allergies, phobias and workflow disruptions endanger the organizational support of canine 2 presence (Hunter et al, 2019). The aim here is to ‘dig deeper’ and align with recent claims that dominance of humans over animals and their relegation to inferior other is analogous to the way humans repress other humans that are deemed ‘too’ different (Clarke and Knights, 2018; Taylor and Fraser, 2019). Through interviews, photographs and observations of eight service dog-disabled employee pairs in different workplaces, the following questions are examined: how are service dogs in/excluded in the organizations under study?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There is now emerging literature on multispecies ethnographies that aims to address the experience of non-human animals when they are involved with humans in practices of work, sport, farming, research, or companionship (see e.g., Birke, 2014;Charles and Wolkowitz, 2019;Ginn, 2013;Despret, 2004Despret, , 2008Despret, , 2013Haraway, 2008;Lorimer, 2010;Miele, 2016;Srinivasan, 2013;Taylor & Fraser, 2018). However there remains a clear division of labour: the social scientists have an array of tools for exploring human experiences, and the animal scientists (ethologists, animal welfare scientists, animal behaviour experts) have their methods for grasping the experience of the non-human animals (Barua & Sinha, 2019).…”
Section: Multispecies Research As (Training) Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%