2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.87.094517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resistive transition in frustrated Josephson-junction arrays on a honeycomb lattice

Abstract: We use driven Monte Carlo dynamics to study the resistive behavior of superconducting Josephson junction arrays on a honeycomb lattice in a magnetic field corresponding to f flux quantum per plaquette. While for f = 1/3 the onset of zero resistance is found at nonzero temperature, for f = 1/2 the results are consistent with a transition scenario where the critical temperature vanishes and the linear resistivity shows thermally activated behavior. We determine the thermal critical exponent of the zero-temperatu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantum superconductor to insulator transitions [52] are evident in the magneto-resistance oscillations in Figs. 1c,g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantum superconductor to insulator transitions [52] are evident in the magneto-resistance oscillations in Figs. 1c,g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Quantum superconductor to insulator transitions [52] perconducting sides of the SIT, respectively (cf. Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, however, there has been a growing interest in a related system, in the form of an ultra-thin superconducting film with a triangular lattice of nanoholes [18][19][20][21][22] . A simple model for this system consists of a Josephson-junction array on a honeycomb lattice, with the triangular lattice of nanoholes corresponding to the dual lattice, and it has already been used to investigated the thermal resistive transition in absence of charging effects 17 . Nevertheless, quantum phase fluctuations should be taken into account since the system undergoes a superconductor to insulator transition for decreasing film thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the honeycomb array, however, the dual lattice is triangular and the resulting vortex lattice is incommensurate, with a macroscopically degenerate ground state 24 . Thermal fluctuations leads to unusual phase-coherence and vortex-order transitions as a function of temperature, which has been investigated both analytically 25,26 and numerically 17,24,[27][28][29] but are still not well understood. However, the phase-coherence and vortex-order transitions at zero temperature for increasing quantum phase fluctuations have not been investigated in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it is closely related to the Bose-Hubbard model, where Cooper pairs interact on a lattice potential, in the limit of a large number of bosons per site 8,12 , to the quantum rotor model [12][13][14] and to ultracold atoms on optical lattices [15][16][17] . For a periodic nanohole film at low magnetic fields, the simplest model consists of a frustrated array of superconducting "grains", where the phase is well defined locally, coupled by Josephson junctions or weak links on a periodic lattice, with the lattice of nanoholes corresponding to the dual lattice, which acts as a vortex pinning center 18,19 . The number of flux quanta per unit cell of the nanohole lattice, which is proportional to the external magnetic field, corresponds to the frustration parameter f of the Josephson-junction array model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%