Resistivity and Radio-Frequency Properties of Two-Generation Trap-Rich Silicon-on-Insulator Substrates

Abstract

Crystal morphologies and resistivity of polysilicon trap-rich layers of two-generation trap-rich silicon-on-insulator (TR-SOI) substrates are studied. It is found that the resistivity of the trap-rich layer of generation 2 (TR-G2) is higher than that of generation 1 (TR-G1), although the crystal morphologies of the trap rich layers are the same. In addition, the rf performance of two-generation TR-SOI substrates is investigated by coplanar waveguide lines and inductors. The results show that both the rf loss and the second harmonic distortion of TR-G2 are smaller than those of TR-G1. These results can be attributed to the higher resistivity values of both the trap-rich layer and the high-resistivity silicon (HR-Si) substrate of TR-G2. Moreover, the rf performance of the TR-SOI substrate with thicker buried oxide is slightly better. The second harmonics of various TR-SOI substrates are simulated and evaluated with the harmonic quality factor model as well. It can be predicted that the TR-SOI substrate will see further improvement in rf performance if the resistivities of both the trap-rich layer and HR-Si substrate increase.

The Effect of Defect Charge and Parasitic Surface Conductance on Aluminum Nitride RF Filter Circuit Loss

“…Due to the presence of charged point defects in AlN, a conductive layer is formed on the HR-Si surface, resulting in a parasitic surface conductivity effect (PSC). The existence of a conductive layer on the surface of HR-Si will reduce the effective resistivity of it and increase the high-frequency loss of the transmission line, thus resulting in larger RF losses and a poor device performance [ 9 ]. Therefore, in order to reduce the number of carriers between the AlN and the HR-Si substrate layer, while suppressing the PSC effect generated by the HR-Si substrate layer, researchers have tried various methods to improve the RF performance of the substrate [ 10 , 11 ].…”