2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015ms000572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolution and domain‐size sensitivity in implicit large‐eddy simulation of the stratocumulus‐topped boundary layer

Abstract: As a complement to measurements, numerical modeling facilitates improved understanding of the complex turbulent processes in the stratocumulus-topped boundary layer (STBL). Due to limited computational resources simulations are often run at too coarse resolutions to resolve details of cloud-top turbulence and potentially in computational domains too small to account for the largest scales of boundary layer circulations. The effects of such deficiencies are not fully understood. Here the influence of resolution… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[] over 10 h. Pedersen et al . [] conducted simulations over 6 h and noted that larger coherent structures could form in longer simulations. The simulations in this work give similar results in the first 6 h, after which domain D 1 diverges (supporting information Figure S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[] over 10 h. Pedersen et al . [] conducted simulations over 6 h and noted that larger coherent structures could form in longer simulations. The simulations in this work give similar results in the first 6 h, after which domain D 1 diverges (supporting information Figure S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large eddy simulations of stratocumulus clouds converge with grid refinement toward reduced entrainment and higher cloud water path [ Stevens et al ., ; Pedersen et al ., ]. In addition to the grid spacing G 1 , we tested the grid spacing G 2 on the domain D 1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further details regarding the moist physics scheme, see Grabowski () and Grabowski (). The lateral boundaries of the computational domain are periodic; the lower boundary is impermeable with a partial slip condition characterized by a specified drag coefficient, and the upper boundary is impermeable with a free slip condition (Pedersen et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consequently obtain SHF=5W/m 2 and LHF=20W/m 2 , in good agreement with the regional daily mean values calculated based on the above mentioned Objectively Analyzed Air‐Sea Fluxes data. The applied surface fluxes (i.e., the SHF/LHF and momentum flux) attenuate with height (as ezfalse/50; e.g., Pedersen et al, ). The surface drag coefficient is set to 0.001, and the surface pressure is set to 1,017.5 hPa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lagrangian approach applied in the UWLCM is referred to as the traditional super-droplet method in the discussion below. Both the babyEULAG model and the UWLCM apply the implicit large-eddy simulation approach, that is, without modeling of the unresolved subgrid-scale transport (see references to other studies applying this method in Grabowski, 2014;Pedersen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Example Of Application: Two-dimensional Moist Thermal Simulamentioning
confidence: 99%