2013
DOI: 10.5650/jos.62.781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolution Behavior of cis- and trans-Octadecenoic Acid Isomers by AOCS Official Method Using SP-2560 Column

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…× 0.20-μm thickness; Bruker), flame ionization detector, and Compass CDS software (Bruker). Fatty acid identification was analyzed using the GLC-532, GLC-401, GLC-643, GLC-642, GLC-463, C18:1 t11, C19:0, C23:0 standard references (Nu-Chek-Prep Inc., Elysian, MN, USA) and the relative retention times according to what was observed in the bibliography (Alves et al, 2009, Lee et al, 2012Yoshinaga, 2013;Bravo-Lamas et al, 2016). FA quantification was performed as described in UNE-EN 12,966-4 Official Method (2015).…”
Section: Carcass Measurements and Meat Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…× 0.20-μm thickness; Bruker), flame ionization detector, and Compass CDS software (Bruker). Fatty acid identification was analyzed using the GLC-532, GLC-401, GLC-643, GLC-642, GLC-463, C18:1 t11, C19:0, C23:0 standard references (Nu-Chek-Prep Inc., Elysian, MN, USA) and the relative retention times according to what was observed in the bibliography (Alves et al, 2009, Lee et al, 2012Yoshinaga, 2013;Bravo-Lamas et al, 2016). FA quantification was performed as described in UNE-EN 12,966-4 Official Method (2015).…”
Section: Carcass Measurements and Meat Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noticed that an oven temperature of ~180°C gave better resolution among FAMEs with <C18, and an oven temperature of ~210°C gave better resolution among FAMEs with >C18. Separation behaviors of cis- and trans-isomers of C18:1 are greatly affected by column and oven temperatures ( 28 , 29 ). Thus, the column temperature was divided into three temperature change stages by setting an appropriate rate of increase in the oven temperature to achieve baseline separation of most FAMEs in the total ion chromatogram (TIC; Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As GC‐MS is superior to GC in terms of analyte selectivity based on the mass, so GC‐MS has the advantage in the analysis of FAME, especially in the presence of matrix background. In the conventional GC procedure, relative response factors for target analytes should be determined in advance, but each TOA isomer has its own response factor, although the difference might be small . By contrast, in GC‐MS, the detector responses of fragment ions derived from different positional isomers of monounsaturated FAME are, in principle, essentially the same, because the rearrangement of double bonds occurring upon ionization produces the same fragments from each isomer .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%