“…Previous studies argued that the Ni-Mo enrichments in the sediments could originate from hydrothermal input (Lott et al, 1999;Steiner et al, 2001), enrichment from seawater (Lehmann et al, 2007;Mao et al, 2002), or more likely the combination of both processes (Pašava et al, 2008). Recent studies demonstrated that the Ni-Mo sulfide ore layer, which is usually less than half meters in thickness (Jiang et al, 2006), has relatively lower ␦ 98 Mo values (<1.6‰) (Lehmann et al, 2007;Xu et al, 2012) (low-temperature hydrothermal fluids ␦ 98 Mo = +0.8‰, McManus et al, 2002), while black shales above and below this Ni-Mo ore layer have high ␦ 98 Mo values (∼1.9-2.4‰) (Chen et al, 2015) (modern seawater ␦ 98 Mo = +2.34‰, Goldberg et al, 2013), suggesting that hydrothermal input of Mo may have contributed only to the Ni-Mo ore layer, but not to the adjacent black shales (Chen et al, 2015). Thus Mo enrichment in the black shales resulted from redox processes and could provide information about the ocean Mo reservoir.…”