2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-021-03065-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolved CFD–DEM simulation on hydrodynamic bridging in a bend rectangle channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interactions between particles and walls, as well as among particles, are computed using the non-linear spring-dashpot Hertz-Mindlin particle contact model, extensively documented in previous studies. 29,49,70…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interactions between particles and walls, as well as among particles, are computed using the non-linear spring-dashpot Hertz-Mindlin particle contact model, extensively documented in previous studies. 29,49,70…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[45][46][47] In contrast, the resolved CFD-DEM method employs fluid cells significantly smaller than particles, enabling a detailed resolution of the fluid field around each particle and the individual calculation of forces on particles. [48][49][50] However, a fundamental challenge lies in defining the moving boundary of the particles. As a fixed mesh approach, the Fictitious Domain Method (FDM) introduces boundary conditions as force terms into the Navier-Stokes equations, thereby correcting velocity and pressure fields accordingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%