Resolving Infiltration‐Induced Water Content Profiles by Inversion of Dispersive Ground‐Penetrating Radar Data

Abstract

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data were collected before, during, and after a 24-min-long forced infiltration event in a large sand tank. High spatial and temporal resolution were achieved by automation of the radar system, thereby allowing these data to be collected during the course of the experiment while continuously changing the distance between the antennas through offsets ranging between 0.17 and 2.17 m. These multi-offset data showed evidence of a phenomenon known as waveguide dispersion during early infiltration times (5-10 min), indicating that a shallow layer of high water content was present. The GPR data exhibiting this dispersive behavior were used to fit water content profiles for the wetting front, i.e., the waveguide, with time using either a blocky-layer model or a piecewise linear function. Results from the separate inversions showed good agreement with in situ soil moisture measurements and a calibrated unsaturated flow model. The piecewise linear model, however, was able to honor the gradational nature of the hydrologically induced waveguide and was in better agreement with the observed soil moisture data. Furthermore, the piecewise linear model returned a water content profile that showed a consistent progression of the wetting front with time, whereas a less consistent progression of the wetting front was observed for the blocky-layer model. Citation: Mangel, A.R., S.M.J. Moysey, and J. van der Kruk. Resolving infiltration-induced water content profiles by inversion of dispersive ground-penetrating radar data. Vadose Zone J. 16(10).

Measuring Soil Water Content with Ground Penetrating Radar: A Decade of Progress

“…Similar to seismic Rayleigh and Love wave analysis, WARR or CMP data can in this case be used to calculate a phase‐velocity spectrum, which provides the frequency‐dependent phase velocity that can be used in inverse modeling to estimate the medium properties (van der Kruk et al, 2010). Recently, this method has been extended for gradational water content profiles and variable sharpness of a wetting front (Mangel et al, 2015, 2017).…”

“…Alternatively, time-lapse surface GPR measurements can be used to investigate the near-surface environment (e.g., Mangel et al, 2017;Pan et al, 2012b). Trinks et al (2001) monitored a point injection experiment into an unsaturated sandbox and used difference plots to visualize the affected infiltration area.…”

Laboratory Measurements of Subsurface Spatial Moisture Content by Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) Diffraction and Reflection Imaging of Agricultural Soils

“…The GPR methods currently measure SMC in various ways: multi-offset techniques from reflected waves [7], waveguide inversion of dispersive data [8,9], off-ground measurements [10], full-waveform inversion [11].…”

Measuring vertical soil water content profiles by combining horizontal borehole and dispersive surface ground penetrating radar data

“…For example, single-layer waveguide inversion has been used to obtain the average dielectric permittivity and thickness of the waveguide during infiltration (Cassiani et al, 2009;Rossi et al, 2015). Using a piece-wise linear model in the waveguide inversion, it is also possible to obtain a continuous and smooth SWC profile that may be more appropriate to describe the actual vertical distribution of SWC during and after infiltration events (Mangel et al, 2017).…”