Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, 12-14 August 2013 2013
DOI: 10.1190/urtec2013-012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving Production Trends in Shale Reservoirs—An Eagle Ford Case Study from Localized Reservoir Characterization to Basin Understanding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quirein et al (2010), Passey et al (2010) and Moncada et al (2013) characterized shale reservoir properties from geological and petrophysical perspectives. Jiang and Spikes (2013), Johnson et al (2013) and Kumar et al (2014) applied advanced imaging and inversion techniques to derive key rock properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quirein et al (2010), Passey et al (2010) and Moncada et al (2013) characterized shale reservoir properties from geological and petrophysical perspectives. Jiang and Spikes (2013), Johnson et al (2013) and Kumar et al (2014) applied advanced imaging and inversion techniques to derive key rock properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moncada et al (2013) showed a case study that two laterals from the Eagle Ford shale had very similar reservoir quality (RQ) but were on very different production trends (Fig.2). Well B has a cumulative production three times that Well A despite having a RQ index lower than Well A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If such a hidden driver can't be understood, then we will likely not be able to make more successful Well B type completions repeatedly. Moncada et al (2013) interpreted that it was likely the existence of natural fractures as the main reason that made Well B outperform Well A. This will still not help us to be able to drill another Well B before we do some serious home work to understand the characterization of the natural fracture systems in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SRV permeability was used to represent the enhanced conductivity volume as a result of the secondary complex fractures activated during the stimulation treatment. It is assumed that the individual fractures link up to form a single connected fracture network with an effective permeability greater than the background matrix (Suliman et al, 2013;Rubin, 2010;Moncada et al, 2013). is evaluated after five years of production; the specific parameters used to calculate the NPV are discussed further in the next chapter.…”
Section: Chapter 6 Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%