2005
DOI: 10.17161/bi.v2i0.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving taxonmic discrepancies: Role of Electronic Catalogues of Known Organisms

Abstract: Abstract. -There is a disparity in availability of nomenclature change literature to the taxonomists of the developing world and availability of taxonomic papers published by developing world scientists to their counterparts in developed part of the globe. This has resulted in several discrepancies in the naming of organisms. Development of electronic catalogues of names of known organisms would help in pointing out these issues. We have attempted to highlight a few such discrepancies found while developing In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps influenced by open‐source software development, many phyloinformatics pipelines are fully open, although in practice they differ greatly in components, overall complexity and applicability. Second, there is a trade‐off between reproducibility and manual processing; human oversight of big data is variously required (Chavan, 2007) but undermines the goal of reproducibility through introducing ambiguity and subjectivity. Herein, manual checks during preliminary analyses inform on the necessary changes or additions to the protocol (e.g.…”
Section: Outlook and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps influenced by open‐source software development, many phyloinformatics pipelines are fully open, although in practice they differ greatly in components, overall complexity and applicability. Second, there is a trade‐off between reproducibility and manual processing; human oversight of big data is variously required (Chavan, 2007) but undermines the goal of reproducibility through introducing ambiguity and subjectivity. Herein, manual checks during preliminary analyses inform on the necessary changes or additions to the protocol (e.g.…”
Section: Outlook and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large scientific repositories are supported by powerful databases and are now focusing on the sharing of information between organizations. A problematic barrier is found in taxonomic differences and data model inconsistencies (Chavan et al, 2005); for this reason many repositories are contributing to the definition of standards to share and transfer their information. The use of spatial data is also becoming common, as the information on the location and distribution of specimens is valuable for research in this field.…”
Section: Existing Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was because the genus Paralia is used both in the Ebenaceae and for a genus of phytoplankton [16]. Other such examples are cited by Page [17,18] and Chavan et al [19]. A second major issue is the inconsistent use of valid names as accepted names or as synonyms.…”
Section: Taxonomic Disambiguationmentioning
confidence: 99%