2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving the deposit dilemma: A new DEA bank efficiency model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
108
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the numerous studies focusing on banking efficiency and productivity using DEA (Berger & Humphrey, 1992;Berger & Humphrey, 1997;Fukuyama & Weber 2009a, b, 2010Holod and Lewis, 2011;Sufian, 2010), an in-depth analysis of banks in Africa is still missing (O'Donnell & Westhnizen, 2002;Azam, Biais, & Dia, 2004;Figueira Kirkpatrick et al, 2007;Okeahalam, 2008;Ikhide, 2008;Kiyota, 2009;Assaf et al, 2010;Kebede and Wassie, 2013), thus indicating a literature gap. The situation contrasts with the extensive research that has been carried out on American banks (Berger, et al, 1987;Bauer, et al 1993;Berger & Humphrey, 1997), on European banks (Barros et al, 2007;Barros et al, 2009;Williams et al, 2010;Kontolaimou & Tsekouras, 2010), Asian banks (Berger et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2005;Kumbhakar & Wang, 2005;Assaf et al 2010;Barros et al, 2010;Barros et al, 2012), and even South American banks (Staub, Souza, & Tabak, 2010;Wanke & Barros, 2014).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the numerous studies focusing on banking efficiency and productivity using DEA (Berger & Humphrey, 1992;Berger & Humphrey, 1997;Fukuyama & Weber 2009a, b, 2010Holod and Lewis, 2011;Sufian, 2010), an in-depth analysis of banks in Africa is still missing (O'Donnell & Westhnizen, 2002;Azam, Biais, & Dia, 2004;Figueira Kirkpatrick et al, 2007;Okeahalam, 2008;Ikhide, 2008;Kiyota, 2009;Assaf et al, 2010;Kebede and Wassie, 2013), thus indicating a literature gap. The situation contrasts with the extensive research that has been carried out on American banks (Berger, et al, 1987;Bauer, et al 1993;Berger & Humphrey, 1997), on European banks (Barros et al, 2007;Barros et al, 2009;Williams et al, 2010;Kontolaimou & Tsekouras, 2010), Asian banks (Berger et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2005;Kumbhakar & Wang, 2005;Assaf et al 2010;Barros et al, 2010;Barros et al, 2012), and even South American banks (Staub, Souza, & Tabak, 2010;Wanke & Barros, 2014).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to size, they were divided into three groups: large, medium, and small. Holod and Lewis (2011) believed that the role of deposits in the past DEA studies was vague, because in some studies deposits were taken as inputs, while in others, they were taken as outputs. Holod and Lewis (2011) suggested a two-stage approach on the basis of a model proposed by Kao and Hwang (2008).…”
Section: Application Of Dea Methods In Banking Industriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model can therefore overcome the deposit dilemma by modelling the dual role of deposits through two stages of estimations. Specifically, deposits are the outputs of the first stage, while in the second stage they are modeled as inputs to be invested in earning assets (Fukuyama and Matousek, 2011;Fukuyama and Weber, 2010;Holod and Lewis, 2011). By revising the literature 2 , we can identify four specifications of the two-stage network DEA models: independent, connected, relational and game theoretic (Kao and Hwang, 2010;Halkos et al, 2014).…”
Section: A Brief Overview Of "Deposit Dilemma" and Dea Two-stage Netwmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collected the data from Bankscope. We specify the inputs and outputs of the two-stage DEA model following Fukuyama and Matousek (2011) and Holod and Lewis (2011). In particular, we use the two-stage approach to overcome the deposits dilemma and ensure the dual role of deposits (Fig.…”
Section: Data and Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation