2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2014.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving the gap between laboratory and field rates of feldspar weathering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The progressive evolution of the surface area during the dissolution process and the impact of these physicochemical changes on dissolution rates should be taken into account to develop more realistic dissolution models (Lüttge et al, 2013). Recent studies showing that the structural anisotropy of a mineral induces changes in terms of surface area and reactivity during the dissolution process are nice illustrations of this assertion (Bandstra and Brantley, 2008;Daval et al, 2013;Godinho et al, 2014a, Gruber et al, 2014Pollet-Villard et al, 2016a, b). The demonstration of the impact of various energy surface sites (dislocations, kink and step sites for minerals, differently coordinated Si surface groups for glasses) on dissolution rates is also a good example (Dove et al, 2008;Fischer et al, 2014;Pollet-Villard et al, 2016;Godinho et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The progressive evolution of the surface area during the dissolution process and the impact of these physicochemical changes on dissolution rates should be taken into account to develop more realistic dissolution models (Lüttge et al, 2013). Recent studies showing that the structural anisotropy of a mineral induces changes in terms of surface area and reactivity during the dissolution process are nice illustrations of this assertion (Bandstra and Brantley, 2008;Daval et al, 2013;Godinho et al, 2014a, Gruber et al, 2014Pollet-Villard et al, 2016a, b). The demonstration of the impact of various energy surface sites (dislocations, kink and step sites for minerals, differently coordinated Si surface groups for glasses) on dissolution rates is also a good example (Dove et al, 2008;Fischer et al, 2014;Pollet-Villard et al, 2016;Godinho et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained weathering rates of silicate minerals from field samples can vary by multiple orders of magnitude from experimentally obtained rates, with the latter usually being higher (White et al, 2001;White and Brantley, 2003;Brantley, 2005;Zhu et al, 2006;Moore et al, 2012). This indicates the complexity of dissolution mechanisms in nature as well as the inability to measure dissolution rates under these complex conditions and time scales in the laboratory (Gruber et al, 2014). Hellmann et al (2012) concluded that chemical weathering of silicate minerals is controlled by nanoscale interfacial https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2020-34 Preprint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, several types of indirect field measurement approaches were combined to yield estimates of in-situ mineral weathering rates (Ackerer et al, 2016;Ferrier et al, 2010). In parallel, mineral dissolution kinetics were evaluated in the laboratory by monitoring dissolution rates against controlled parameters, such as T, pH or ∆ (Carroll and Knauss, 2005;Gruber et al, 2014;Hellmann and Tisserand, 2006). This framework allowed to build up databases of parameters used in semi-empirical mineral weathering rate laws (Palandri and Kharaka, 2004;Rimstidt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%