2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving the spatial variability of soil N using fractions of soil organic matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a key determinant of soil fertility and quality, TN also plays a vital part in generating and maintaining soil productivity in agricultural ecosystems (Wang et al 2015;Zhang et al 2016;Ma et al 2018). Therefore, knowledge of the spatial variability in SOC and TN is indispensable to evaluate ecosystem productivity (Córdova et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a key determinant of soil fertility and quality, TN also plays a vital part in generating and maintaining soil productivity in agricultural ecosystems (Wang et al 2015;Zhang et al 2016;Ma et al 2018). Therefore, knowledge of the spatial variability in SOC and TN is indispensable to evaluate ecosystem productivity (Córdova et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen (N) is one of the most important soil nutrients in farmland, even it is the limiting nutrient in many agroecosystems, especially in terms of available nitrogen (AN), which highly correlates with fertilization, tillage methods, and crop choice (Crabtree & Bernston, ; Brady & Weil, ). A better understanding of the spatial variability of AN and its driving factors is crucial for refining soil and crop management practices, slowing down land degradation, and developing and improving sustainable land use practices (Córdova et al, ; Brady & Weil, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Diguillin soil, the proportion of SOC present as FR–SOM was quite typical of values found in temperate nonvolcanic soils (Poirier et al ., ; Córdova et al ., ). However in the Santa Barbara soil, the proportion was consistently at the high end of this range and substantially exceeded it in the mixed rotations (12.3–13.5%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However in the Santa Barbara soil, the proportion was consistently at the high end of this range and substantially exceeded it in the mixed rotations (12.3–13.5%). In contrast, for both soils, the amount of C present in the IALF was extremely small, and well below the range typical for nonvolcanic soils (2.0–5.6%, Poirier et al ., ; Sohi et al ., ; Córdova et al ., ); in the Diguillin and Santa Barbara soils, it was always <1%, and sometimes <0.2% at Diguillin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%