2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep03(2019)177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolving the Weinberg paradox with topology

Abstract: Long ago Weinberg showed, from first principles, that the amplitude for a single photon exchange between an electric current and a magnetic current violates Lorentz invariance. The obvious conclusion at the time was that monopoles were not allowed in quantum field theory. Since the discovery of topological monopoles there has thus been a paradox. On the one hand, topological monopoles are constructed in Lorentz invariant quantum field theories, while on the other hand, the low-energy effective theory for such … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our model simply realizes the regime where the Abelian force associated with the monopoles is Higgsed, therefore the monopoles are expected to confine. This, in turn, may new dynamics relevant for the dark sector [85,86].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model simply realizes the regime where the Abelian force associated with the monopoles is Higgsed, therefore the monopoles are expected to confine. This, in turn, may new dynamics relevant for the dark sector [85,86].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dressed couplings of the monopole to the A µ (photon) and B µ (dual-photon) fields are given by ZeA and ZeB respectively, where Z is the wave-function renormalization factor, computed non-perturbatively due to the quantum corrections induced by the strongly-coupled U (1)strong gauge interactions. Notice that in our approach, in contrast to that of Zwanziger [2], which was adopted in [18], the photon (A µ ) and the dual photon (B µ ) are independent fields, which explains the presence of the last two graphs on the right-hand side of the figure (connected with a "+" sign). When however consider the monopole, one should impose on the classical on-shell gauge fields the constraint (10), which brings back the Dirac-string effects.…”
Section: A Perturbative Effective Magnetic Charge For Slowly-moving mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For slowly moving monopoles, Z 1 and this ensures perturbativity of all couplings, hence the depicted graphs denote the leading corrections in both A µ and B µ sectors. In such a case, resummation of the soft on-shell photons exponentiates such string effects into phases of the pertinent scattering amplitudes [18]. of the monopole, and how our effective theory (9) describes the scattering of the latter with charged matter or its production from charged matter [19].…”
Section: A Perturbative Effective Magnetic Charge For Slowly-moving mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations