2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.03.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resonance and continuum Gamow shell model with realistic nuclear forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
125
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the USDB shell model (SM) [4] predicts an excited state with J π = 1 2 + at about 3.3 MeV above the ground state (g.s. ), in relative agreement with the continuum SM (CSM) [5] and the Gamow shell model (GSM) [6,7]. The CSM and the GSM also predict another narrow state with J π = 5 2 + at E ≈ 4.5 MeV.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…For instance, the USDB shell model (SM) [4] predicts an excited state with J π = 1 2 + at about 3.3 MeV above the ground state (g.s. ), in relative agreement with the continuum SM (CSM) [5] and the Gamow shell model (GSM) [6,7]. The CSM and the GSM also predict another narrow state with J π = 5 2 + at E ≈ 4.5 MeV.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…These results suggest that, in general, resonances bear a strong coupling to the non-resonant continuum, with the induced configuration mixing becoming more and more important when the width increases. Thus, coupling to continuum should be considered properly in the treatment of nuclei close to drip-line [25,[29][30][31]. Trineutron results have been obtained without truncations.…”
Section: Calculations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It arises from an order by order expansion of contact terms in the EFT interaction, whose parameters are fitted on the experimental data associated to the structure of proton-rich nuclei [61]. The EFT interaction possesses the overall features of realistic nucleon-nucleon interactions [29], and is non-local in the short-range region, contrary to the FHT interaction. We will see, in fact, that the results of the EFT interaction are closer to experimental data than those provided by the FHT interaction.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%