1962
DOI: 10.13182/nse62-a26181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resonance and Thermal Neutron Self-Shielding in Cobalt Foils and Wires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figures 4 and 5, the result of present simulated G res factors for Gold and Cobalt foils has reasonable agreement with the experimental and calculated data by Gongalves [9], Brose [12] and Eastwood [2].…”
Section: Advanced Technologies and Applications Of Neutron Activationsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figures 4 and 5, the result of present simulated G res factors for Gold and Cobalt foils has reasonable agreement with the experimental and calculated data by Gongalves [9], Brose [12] and Eastwood [2].…”
Section: Advanced Technologies and Applications Of Neutron Activationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The calculated resonance neutron self-shielding correction factors for Cobalt foils of different thickness, in comparison with published data by Gongalves[9] and Eastwood[2].…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gamma-ray count rates were measured using OR-TEC 70% HPGe detector; energy resolution about 4.1 keV at the 1332.5 keV γ-line of 60 Co. The data acquisition and analysis were performed using Genie 2000 Spectroscopy Software.…”
Section: Gamma Ray Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, this type of overall effective self-shielding factor for a mixed neutron spectrum is composed from G th and its epithermal equivalent G epi and can be applied to bare target irradiation measurements [46]. Unfortunately, theoretical calculations for G epi are environment dependent and contain important alterations according to the current unknowns at the McClellan site [41,[48][49][50][51][52][53]. Therefore, our new empirical calibration approach aims to isolate and still calculate this overall effective self-shielding factor when detailed reactor parameter information is not available.…”
Section: Activation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%