2014
DOI: 10.1142/s2010194514600544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resonance Dynamics in Coupled Channels

Abstract: General properties of the S-matrix, such as constraints from two-and three-body unitarity as well as gauge invariance, are discussed and illustrated for the example of a dynamical coupled channel approach. The Jülich model has been updated to analyze πN , ηN , and KY production as well as pion photoproduction. Partial wave amplitudes and resonance properties are determined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Of the three spectral features that emerge in this channel, two are associated with the Roper resonance. [This two-pole character of the Roper is common to many analyses of the scattering data, including one involving Roper himself (Arndt et al, 1985) and more recent analyses of πN scattering data (Arndt et al, 2006;Cutkosky and Wang, 1990;Döring et al, 2009). ]…”
Section: Dynamical Coupled Channels Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…• Of the three spectral features that emerge in this channel, two are associated with the Roper resonance. [This two-pole character of the Roper is common to many analyses of the scattering data, including one involving Roper himself (Arndt et al, 1985) and more recent analyses of πN scattering data (Arndt et al, 2006;Cutkosky and Wang, 1990;Döring et al, 2009). ]…”
Section: Dynamical Coupled Channels Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…1 should yield masses that are larger than experiment because, as explained elsewhere [10,77], the kernel in Fig. 1 omits all those resonant contributions which may be associated with the meson-baryon final-state interactions that are resummed in dynamical coupled channels models [78][79][80] in order to transform a bare-baryon into the observed state. Our Faddeev equation should therefore be understood as producing the dressed-quark core of the bound-state, not the completely-dressed and hence observable object.…”
Section: Results From the Faddeev Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They differ at first glance, but the discrepancies can be well understood: The solutions of the Faddeev equation with the kernel in Fig. 1 should be interpreted as the dressed-quark core of the bound-state, instead of representing the fully-dressed observable object, because the kernel omits [29,30] all those resonant contributions which may be associated with the meson-baryoncloud finite-state-interactions (MB FSIs) resummed in DCC models [28,[31][32][33][34][35][36]. Therefore, the critical comparison is not between the computed dressed-quark core masses and empirical values of the pole-positions but between the former and the values determined for the mesonundressed bare bound-state; e.g.…”
Section: Nucleon and Roper Structurementioning
confidence: 99%