2022
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.105.053102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resonance-enhanced x-ray multiple ionization of a polyatomic molecule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It uses the beam from the SASE3 soft X-ray undulator between the carbon and argon K edges, in the range 260-3200 eV. The instrument, described in detail by Mazza et al (2012) and Meyer et al (2023), was commissioned in 2018 (Meyer et al, 2023) and the results of the first successful user experiments have been published (Kastirke et al, 2020a,b;Eichmann et al, 2020;Mazza et al, 2020;LaForge et al, 2021;Jahnke et al, 2021;Li et al, 2021Li et al, , 2022aBoll et al, 2022;Feinberg et al, 2022). Experiments at the SQS instrument exploit the intense, short and coherent X-ray pulses for nonlinear phenomena studies (Mazza et al, 2020;Eichmann et al, 2020;LaForge et al, 2021;Boll et al, 2022), for time-resolved experiments following dynamical processes on the femtosecond timescale (Kastirke et al, 2020b;Jahnke et al, 2021;Grychtol et al, 2021;Rivas et al, 2022) and for investigations using coherent scattering techniques (Ekeberg et al, 2022;Feinberg et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses the beam from the SASE3 soft X-ray undulator between the carbon and argon K edges, in the range 260-3200 eV. The instrument, described in detail by Mazza et al (2012) and Meyer et al (2023), was commissioned in 2018 (Meyer et al, 2023) and the results of the first successful user experiments have been published (Kastirke et al, 2020a,b;Eichmann et al, 2020;Mazza et al, 2020;LaForge et al, 2021;Jahnke et al, 2021;Li et al, 2021Li et al, , 2022aBoll et al, 2022;Feinberg et al, 2022). Experiments at the SQS instrument exploit the intense, short and coherent X-ray pulses for nonlinear phenomena studies (Mazza et al, 2020;Eichmann et al, 2020;LaForge et al, 2021;Boll et al, 2022), for time-resolved experiments following dynamical processes on the femtosecond timescale (Kastirke et al, 2020b;Jahnke et al, 2021;Grychtol et al, 2021;Rivas et al, 2022) and for investigations using coherent scattering techniques (Ekeberg et al, 2022;Feinberg et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the photon-energy dependence was generally expected to map the decreasing photoabsorption cross section for increasing photon energy (far above any ionisation edges), the opposite trend has been reported for very high X-ray intensities 26 , and transient resonances during charge-up 28 can lead to charge states significantly higher than expected at certain photon energies [24][25][26][29][30][31] . Transient resonances have recently been found to influence molecular multiphoton ionisation 32 and to dramatically enhance scattering cross sections in X-ray diffraction imaging 33 , but they can also cause increased radiation damage 34 . These observations illustrate the complex interplay between imaging and transient electronic structure, as well as the necessity for a careful choice of all X-ray pulse parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%