Resonance Neutron Capture in 86,87Sr

Hicks, G. C.; Allen, B.J.; Musgrove, AR de L; Macklin, R. L.

doi:10.1071/ph820267

Cited by 24 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our results fairly reproduce their data. Our calculation overestimates those of Hicks et al [60] for 87 Sr. However, there remains certain ambiguity with their data for 86 Sr at extremely low energies below 7 keV.…”

Section: B Total Capture Cross Sectionscontrasting

confidence: 82%

Neutron capture reactions relevant to s-process and p-process in the domain of the $N=50$ shell closure

Dutta,

Gangopadhyay,

Bhattacharyya

2016

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Radiative thermal neutron capture cross sections for nuclei participating in s-process and pprocess nucleosynthesis in and around N = 50 closed neutron shell have been calculated in statistical semi-microscopic Hauser-Feshbach approach for the energy range of astrophysical interest. A folded optical-model potential is constructed utilizing the standard DDM3Y real nucleon-nucleon interaction. The folding of the interaction with target radial matter densities, obtained from the relativistic-mean-field approach, is done in coordinate space using the spherical approximation. The standard nuclear reaction code TALYS1.8 is used for cross-section calculation. The cross sections are compared with experimental results and reasonable agreements are found for almost all cases. Maxwellian-averaged cross sections (MACS) for the nuclei are presented at a single thermal energy of 30 keV relevant to s-process. We have also presented the MACS values over a range of energy from 5 to 100 keV for neutron magic nuclei with (N = 50).

show abstract

Section: B Total Capture Cross Sectionscontrasting

confidence: 82%

Neutron capture reactions relevant to s-process and p-process in the domain of the $N=50$ shell closure

Dutta,

Gangopadhyay,

Bhattacharyya

2016

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Profiles: Psychological and Behavioral

Edwards¹

2009

Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The often misused term profile is best restricted to investigative tools used to narrow down likely suspects and establish reasonable suspicion necessary to justify an action in the field. Reasonable suspicion is reviewed on a case‐by‐case basis to assure protection of suspect rights. As evidence at trial, profiles easily become little more than a means to either link a defendant to undesirable traits or stereotypes; or for the defense to attribute by association positive or sympathetic attributes to a defendant. Although behavioral science evidence may be proffered for use at trial, including statistical compilations, such evidence should have relevance to the applicable party as an individual, and the term profile avoided when possible. Expert testimony concerning a trait of an accused may only be used as evidence that the accused possesses such a trait. It must be left to the jury to determine whether and how such a trait may influence the facts of the case. While the term profile may appear to give behavioral evidence an aura of scientific respectability, such labels themselves do nothing to enhance the stature of the substantive underlying observations. In fact, if anything, good science and credible observation are more readily accepted without them.

show abstract

Syndromes: Psychological

Edwards¹

2009

Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After a decade of debate and publicity, the legal status of the most advanced behavioral science contributions to the criminal justice process remain wedded to fundamental concepts that would be easily recognized by the twelfth century jurist Henry de Bracton were he with us today. In order for syndrome evidence to be admissible, the physical, emotional, or mental condition addressed by the evidence must be presented in a manner that meets the scientific requirements for legal evidence. Expert testimony concerning a trait of an accused may only be used as evidence that the accused possesses such a trait. It must be left to the jury to determine whether and how such a trait may influence its view of the facts of the case. Although the term syndrome may appear to give behavioral evidence an aura of scientific respectability, such labels themselves do nothing to enhance the stature of the substantive underlying observations. In fact, if anything, good science and credible observation are more readily accepted without them.

show abstract

Resonance Neutron Capture in 86,87Sr

Cited by 24 publications

References 6 publications

Neutron capture reactions relevant to s-process and p-process in the domain of the $N=50$ shell closure

Neutron capture reactions relevant to s-process and p-process in the domain of the $N=50$ shell closure

Profiles: Psychological and Behavioral

Syndromes: Psychological

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About