2004
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.43.6138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resonant Frequency Control of a Microspherical Cavity by Temperature Adjustment

Abstract: We demonstrate frequency tuning of whispering-gallery mode resonances in a fused-silica microsphere by means of temperature control. Scattering spectra of the microsphere are measured using a tunable narrow-linewidth diode laser, and the frequency scale is precisely calibrated from a simultaneously observed spectrum of rubidium vapor. The resonant frequencies of whispering-gallery modes can be varied linearly by temperature elevation and lowering, at a rate of -2.6 GHz/K for a 190 µm sphere.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the period of the mechanical (or any coupling noise) oscillation is longer (i.e., the change in temperature is slower) than the thermal response time, then the thermal feedback (i.e., the shifting of the WGMs) has time to enhance or damp the variation in temperature. The thermal decay rate from (i) the optical mode volume to the rest of the silica microsphere was estimated by Schmidt et al [30] to be on the order of microseconds, and (ii) from the rest of the sphere to the surrounding medium was on the order of milliseconds, whereas the thermal shift rate of a silica sphere is around 2.5 GHz/K [39]. At higher oscillation frequencies, the period of the oscillation becomes comparable or less than the thermal response time of the sphere and the thermal feedback should be cut off [30] (e.g., by the pendulum moving) before it has a chance to take effect.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the period of the mechanical (or any coupling noise) oscillation is longer (i.e., the change in temperature is slower) than the thermal response time, then the thermal feedback (i.e., the shifting of the WGMs) has time to enhance or damp the variation in temperature. The thermal decay rate from (i) the optical mode volume to the rest of the silica microsphere was estimated by Schmidt et al [30] to be on the order of microseconds, and (ii) from the rest of the sphere to the surrounding medium was on the order of milliseconds, whereas the thermal shift rate of a silica sphere is around 2.5 GHz/K [39]. At higher oscillation frequencies, the period of the oscillation becomes comparable or less than the thermal response time of the sphere and the thermal feedback should be cut off [30] (e.g., by the pendulum moving) before it has a chance to take effect.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current design of our integrated device was made based on the compromise between the two contradictory requirements. We would like to point out that to realize on-chip tuning of resonant wavelength with external heaters, a significantly longer time (e.g., a few minutes as reported in [24] ) is required to reach the thermal equilibrium.…”
Section: On-chip Tunable Microresonatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods for tuning microcavities have already been explored, e.g. external heaters [3][4][5], pressure/strain techniques [6,7], and electro-optical [8], electro-thermal [9] and thermo-optical [10] effects. All of these methods result in relatively small tuning ranges of < 300 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%