2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2882795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource Allocation for Cognitive Satellite Communications Downlink

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhu et al [23] used multidimensional knapsack theory to minimize energy consumption while considering user's delay constraint. To improve the spectrum utilization of satellites, Zuo et al [24] jointly optimized allocation of time, spectrum, power, and beam and solved it by heuristic algorithm. Mai et al [25] used Stackelberg game method to reduce the transmission delay of remote sensing data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhu et al [23] used multidimensional knapsack theory to minimize energy consumption while considering user's delay constraint. To improve the spectrum utilization of satellites, Zuo et al [24] jointly optimized allocation of time, spectrum, power, and beam and solved it by heuristic algorithm. Mai et al [25] used Stackelberg game method to reduce the transmission delay of remote sensing data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [22] proposes a beam-hopping algorithm, which adjusts the beam size according to the business distribution. Reference [23] uses a heuristic algorithm to achieve frequency band selection and beam allocation and adopts Lagrangian dual algorithm and water-filling-assisted Lagrangian dual algorithm to achieve power allocation. Reference [24] proposes a channel allocation scheme of mixed random access and on-demand access, which reduces system delay within the throughput threshold.…”
Section: Leo Satellite Resource Allocation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12] and [13], the beam control and beamforming techniques were adopted respectively to maximize the signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) towards the desired secondary system and to minimize the interference towards the primary system. In the secondary category, spectrum sharing between broadcasting satellite service (BSS) feeder links and fixed satellite service (FSS) downlinks can be based on a simple coordination mechanism by defining cognitive (protection) zones around the BSS stations [14]- [16] or a beam-hopping (BH) scheme [17]. In [18], a BH scheme-based dual satellite coexistence scenario was proposed, in which the power control method and the exclusion zone method were applied to avoid producing harmful interference to the primary system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharma et al [18] presented cognitive BH for spectral coexistence of two GEO multibeam satellites, and they did not consider the traffic demand distribution too. Zuo et al [17] presented two 4-D (time, frequency, power, and dedicated spot beam) RA schemes in the cognitive satellite system, but it was not in the GEO/LEO scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%