2019
DOI: 10.1109/comst.2018.2867268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource Allocation for Ultra-Dense Networks: A Survey, Some Research Issues and Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
102
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 280 publications
1
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the above benefits, there exist several challenges in H-CRAN MEC systems that can be induced by colocation of MEC and H-CRAN, e.g., deployment scenarios design. In the following, the major challenges of H-CRAN MEC systems are discussed [51], [208].…”
Section: B Motivations and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the above benefits, there exist several challenges in H-CRAN MEC systems that can be induced by colocation of MEC and H-CRAN, e.g., deployment scenarios design. In the following, the major challenges of H-CRAN MEC systems are discussed [51], [208].…”
Section: B Motivations and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…f ∈ F, and n ∈ N . As such, M f APs in cluster f constitute a generalized APG, denoted by a set G f , to serve user n by concurrently transmitting independent signals in a user-centric way 4 , for G f ⊂ M. We wish to remark that the APs in generalized APG G f also belong to cluster f . 1 We would like to mention that our proposed optimization framework for joint resource allocation and user association is conducted within the considered time duration, which can be interpreted as a specific time slot or a period of time.…”
Section: Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Noticing that a detailed discussion on the clustering method is beyond the scope of this work. 4 We should pay more attention to the difference between the AP cluster and the APG in this work. An AP cluster is referred to as the result of the task of classifying all the APs into a specific disjoint part according to their spatial location relations.…”
Section: Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of relying on a tower-mounted macro base station (MBS) with high transmit power in macrocell sending signals to a large number of user equipments (UEs), e.g., 0.2 UEs/m 2 , UDNs deploy tens or hundreds more of low-powered radio access points (APs) with smaller coverage areas to coherently provide wireless access service for those users. As such, the ultra-dense deployment of APs has potentials to bring multiple benefits, e.g., enlarged cell coverage, improved spatial reuse of wireless resources, enhanced performance gains, etc [4,5].In spite of being advantageous, such an increasing density of APs with dense cell coverage, e.g., 10 3 APs/km 2 or more, results in the complex distribution of APs in UDNs and even possible overlapped coverage for the users. Therefore, simply using the traditional cell-centric architecture poses extra challenges on network planning and design for UDNs, e.g., complicated resource management, severe inter-cell interference, large signalling overhead, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%