2020
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1779392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource Allocation in COVID-19 Research: Which Trials? Which Patients?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, when multiple research teams require participants, triage committees are needed to direct recruitment away from low priority, duplicative, or underpowered trials with little potential for usable findings 1315. Institutions must guarantee that patients with covid-19 are informed of all available trial options and assured autonomy in their decisions about participation 15…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, when multiple research teams require participants, triage committees are needed to direct recruitment away from low priority, duplicative, or underpowered trials with little potential for usable findings 1315. Institutions must guarantee that patients with covid-19 are informed of all available trial options and assured autonomy in their decisions about participation 15…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as research is concerned, significant challenges have been encountered in terms of the planning of clinical research designs, sourcing of funding for research as research priorities change, as well as significant questions around ethical clearance of studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Questions around ethical clearance have had ethical committees and institutional research review boards challenged by their mandate to facilitate ethical research whilst adhering to health and safety regulations implemented to protect and safeguard the safety of research participants and researchers (Beach et al, 2020 ; Lumeng et al, 2020 ; Perez et al, 2020 ; Sebothoma et al, 2021 ; Wieten, Burgart, & Cho, 2020 ). Weiner, Balasubramaniam, Shah and Javier ( 2020 ) believed that the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic had on general research and on research specific to the pandemic raises numerous important factors: (1) the significance of research, (2) challenges of research, especially during public health emergencies (PHEs) and (3) resources and opportunities towards improving research to become more efficient and cost effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 Non-COVID-19 studies are also disadvantaged in terms of the enhanced participant recruitment for COVID-19 studies. 11 , 18 Non-COVID-19 studies and non-COVID-19 diseases have therefore been indirectly judged as less important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%