1992
DOI: 10.1016/0195-9255(92)90020-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource and environmental profile analysis: A life cycle environmental assessment for products and procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The LCA methodology used in this study follows the stages outlined by International Organization for Standards (ISO) 14040 [17], as well as those described by Allen and Shonnard [2], Owens [23], Curran [4], and Hunt et al [15]. The four major stages of the LCA applied in this study include:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LCA methodology used in this study follows the stages outlined by International Organization for Standards (ISO) 14040 [17], as well as those described by Allen and Shonnard [2], Owens [23], Curran [4], and Hunt et al [15]. The four major stages of the LCA applied in this study include:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first life cycle analysis of products was initiated in the USA in 1969 under Coca-Cola's sponsorship. The purpose of this study was to compare different beverage containers to determine which produced the fewest effects on the environment [31]. This concept became known as a resource and environmental profile analysis and, between 1970 and 1978, a number of similar studies were conducted in the USA.…”
Section: Lca and Beverage Packagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk managers can use NEBA to consider the range of environmental cost/ benefits associated with each remedial alternative to make more informed decisions (Efroymson et al, 2004). NEBA can be used to achieve a more complete assessment of an action, a product, and/or a technology (Hunt et al, 1992). NEBA seeks to integrate the positive and negative aspects of an environmental action, such as sediment remediation, beyond consideration of chemical risks.…”
Section: Utilizing Net Environmental Benefits Analysis and Relative Ementioning
confidence: 99%