2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2005.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource availability and meiofauna in sediment of tropical seagrass beds: Local versus global trends

Abstract: Characterisation of productivity-diversity relationships forms an essential step towards a better understanding of biodiversity. In terrestrial systems this is a topical subject and most studies reported a hump-shaped relationship. For marine systems, however, the number of studies dedicated to this is low despite the high interest in this productivity-diversity relationship.The present study reports on meiofauna density/diversity patterns in relation to resource availability as an indicator for the productivi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A positive relationship between total meiofaunal abundance and the input of organic matter has been reported repeatedly (De Troch et al 2006, Mokievsky et al 2007, Lampadariou et al 2009). Thus, the total abundance could be treated (under some reservations) as a proxy for the available food supply.…”
Section: Diversity Measures: Methodological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A positive relationship between total meiofaunal abundance and the input of organic matter has been reported repeatedly (De Troch et al 2006, Mokievsky et al 2007, Lampadariou et al 2009). Thus, the total abundance could be treated (under some reservations) as a proxy for the available food supply.…”
Section: Diversity Measures: Methodological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Lower meiofaunal diversity in the seagrass beds within the Northern Location may also suggest a lower productivity here than the seagrass beds in the subtropical Southern Location (De Troch et al 2006), the latter being more dense. However, with only one Location representing each Region, it is not possible to state at which spatial scale these differences occur.…”
Section: Seagrassesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Others have recorded reduced or equal meiofaunal abundance in seagrass beds relative to bare sediments relating this to hydrological or predation regimes (Decho et al 1985;Siebert and Branch 2007). In the former case, seagrass beds are suggested to proved increased resource availability for meiofauna (Danovaro 1996;De Troch et al 2006). In the latter it is thought they provide 'better' shelter for macrofauna and small megafauna, resulting in increased predation of the meiofauna (Decho et al 1985).…”
Section: Beaches and Seagrassesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given those differences, it is likely that feeding habits, and therefore the role of these copepods in EMAs' food web functioning differs. In other environments, trophic niches of copepod species belonging to the same eco-morphotype can be different (Arroyo et al, 2006;Azovsky et al, 2005;Carman and Fry, 2002;Carman and Thistle, 1985;De Troch et al, 2006b;Pace and Carman, 1996;Steinarsdóttir et al, 2010). How resource partitioning determines co-existence of dominant eco-morphotypes in EMAs remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%