2004
DOI: 10.1080/14649055.2004.10765996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource description in a heterogeneous system environment

Abstract: The author describes the challenges libraries face in implementing digital object management systems (DOMS) and information retrieval portals alongside the traditional integrated library systems (ILS). In particular, resource description policies, rules, and formats will be affected by the new applications of these systems. Multiple metadata formats will coexist and will be based on diverse-or nonexistent-rules. Achieving sufficient semantic interoperability between these applications is a demanding task. In t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for bibliographic control's support for management functions, these functions can and increasingly do happen in separate but linked systems. Juha Hakala, in his 2004 article on the emerging heterogeneous system environment, wrote "in one vision of the future, even the monolithic ILS will be split into smaller pieces … integrated systems will be replaced by modular ones, which by definition are a perfect fit for networked or consortial environments" [62]. Recently Roland Dietz and Carl Grant, presidents of Endeavor and VTLS respectively, described the "dis-integrating world of library automation" and called for library systems to be more compatible with other systems [63].…”
Section: Revitalizing Catalogs For the Communities They Servementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for bibliographic control's support for management functions, these functions can and increasingly do happen in separate but linked systems. Juha Hakala, in his 2004 article on the emerging heterogeneous system environment, wrote "in one vision of the future, even the monolithic ILS will be split into smaller pieces … integrated systems will be replaced by modular ones, which by definition are a perfect fit for networked or consortial environments" [62]. Recently Roland Dietz and Carl Grant, presidents of Endeavor and VTLS respectively, described the "dis-integrating world of library automation" and called for library systems to be more compatible with other systems [63].…”
Section: Revitalizing Catalogs For the Communities They Servementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing complexity of the library systems marketplace is shown by the different providers of such systems, which included individual libraries, library consortia, library systems vendors and subscription agents/aggregators (Collins, 2008). Other systems that libraries might be using now to manage access to digital content -in addition to their existing integrated library system -include a digital object or digital asset management system (DOMS or DAMS) for locally-produced content, an information retrieval portal or federated search engine for cross-searching of databases (Hakala, 2004) and a virtual learning environment (VLE, also known as a learning or course management system), typically used by academic libraries to manage access to electronic course readings or 'ereserves' and to information literacy tutorials (Black, 2008).…”
Section: Transformation -Network-based Collectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%