1998
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource distribution, female home range dispersion and male spatial interactions: group structure in a solitary carnivore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
155
2
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
155
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Strong signals in the reconstruction of evolutionary transitions to cooperative and communal breeding in mammals [24] may similarly predict intraspecific variation between cooperative breeding and pair-living, and between communal breeding and groups with plural breeding and polygyny in some contemporary species. The co-occurrence of groups and solitary individuals may reflect an unstable balance between the ecological and social factors generating costs and benefits of living in groups [88], with variation in predation risk and food abundance being the most important factors [85,[89][90][91][92]. Intraspecific variation between groups and pairs [93], or between groups with one or multiple males [94][95][96], can be largely attributed to the outcome of sexual conflict over sex-specific reproductive strategies [97][98][99][100].…”
Section: (I) Social Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong signals in the reconstruction of evolutionary transitions to cooperative and communal breeding in mammals [24] may similarly predict intraspecific variation between cooperative breeding and pair-living, and between communal breeding and groups with plural breeding and polygyny in some contemporary species. The co-occurrence of groups and solitary individuals may reflect an unstable balance between the ecological and social factors generating costs and benefits of living in groups [88], with variation in predation risk and food abundance being the most important factors [85,[89][90][91][92]. Intraspecific variation between groups and pairs [93], or between groups with one or multiple males [94][95][96], can be largely attributed to the outcome of sexual conflict over sex-specific reproductive strategies [97][98][99][100].…”
Section: (I) Social Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Henner et al (2004) noted that availability of water influenced den-site selection on prairie landscapes in Mississippi. Others have suggested that water availability could influence home-range aggregation (Gehrt and Fritzell 1998) or size (Beasley and Rhodes 2010). Thus, Raccoon abundance and space use can be influenced by a variety of landscape and local factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study revealed that local populations sorted into two distinct groups, exhibiting either significantly greater or lesser (non-significant) levels of kin-structure than would be expected at random, a pattern primarily driven by the fact that contributions to population persistence stemming from immigration versus natality differed markedly among local populations. This finding, in combination with strong evidence for a high degree of site fidelity of female raccoons to their natal patch (Gehrt and Fritzell 1998, Ratnayeke et al 2002, Cullingham et al 2008, Dharmarajan et a. 2009, Beasley et al 2013, led (Dharmarajan et al 2014) to hypothesize that significant spatial variation in vital rates exists for raccoons inhabiting fragmented agricultural ecosystems, consistent with expectations of a sourcesink population structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%