1977
DOI: 10.1086/226464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
2,456
1
264

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,186 publications
(2,752 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
31
2,456
1
264
Order By: Relevance
“…They have variously emphasised rational and calculated self-interest (McCarthy & Zald, 1977), socialpsychological factors such as efficacy and strong identification with the group whose grievances the movement addresses (Klandermans, 1984;Snow & Oliver, 1993), participation in social networks from which individuals are recruited (Diani, 2004;McAdam & Paulsen, 1993), the processes of frame alignment (Snow, Rochford, Worden, & Benford, 1986), and family background, class, education, and other elements of political socialisation that support activist engagement (Sherkat & Blocker, 1994). Rather than taking up a position in these longstanding debates over the factors that are most predictive of participation, this paper instead follows a growing number of studies that examine how activists themselves talk about their routes into activism (Lyson, 2014;McGuire, Stewart, & Curtin, 2010;RuizJunco, 2011;Valocchi, 2013).…”
Section: Mobilisation and Narrativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have variously emphasised rational and calculated self-interest (McCarthy & Zald, 1977), socialpsychological factors such as efficacy and strong identification with the group whose grievances the movement addresses (Klandermans, 1984;Snow & Oliver, 1993), participation in social networks from which individuals are recruited (Diani, 2004;McAdam & Paulsen, 1993), the processes of frame alignment (Snow, Rochford, Worden, & Benford, 1986), and family background, class, education, and other elements of political socialisation that support activist engagement (Sherkat & Blocker, 1994). Rather than taking up a position in these longstanding debates over the factors that are most predictive of participation, this paper instead follows a growing number of studies that examine how activists themselves talk about their routes into activism (Lyson, 2014;McGuire, Stewart, & Curtin, 2010;RuizJunco, 2011;Valocchi, 2013).…”
Section: Mobilisation and Narrativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The starting point for the crystallization of this second analytical dimension was resource mobilisation theory. Resource mobilisation is, according to McCarthy andZald (1977: 1216), a process of aggregation of requisite means for collective action. In resource mobilisation theory (RMT) social movement organisations are the lynchpin of collective action due to their capacity to accumulate and convert material and immaterial resources such as money, labour, facilities or legitimacy (1977: 1220) into purposeful collective action.…”
Section: The Dependent Variables: Motivational and Resource Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 De tal modo que o consumo dos bens seja apenas uma pequena parte do processo inteiro de consumo que inclui relações sociais e culturais de classificação e uso dos bens (Douglas & Isherwood, 2009, p. 124). 4 Um dos primeiros a falar, junto com McCarthy (McCarthy & Zald, 1990), em nome da resource mobilization (a teoria da mobilização de recursos).…”
Section: Notasunclassified