2001
DOI: 10.1109/90.974535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource sharing for replicated synchronous groupware

Abstract: Abstract-We describe problems associated with accessing data resources external to the application, which we term externalities, in replicated synchronous collaborative applications. Accessing externalities such as files, databases, network connections, environment variables, and the system clock is not as straightforward in replicated collaborative software as in single-user applications or centralized collaborative systems. We describe ad hoc solutions that add to development cost and complexity because the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An extensive collection of research investigations surrounds such topics as distributed teams (Olson and Teasley, 1996;Grinter et al, 1999;Mark et al, 2003), computer-mediated communication (Galegher and Kraut, 1990;Markus, 1994;Bos et al, 2002), and more recent phenomena such as distributed gaming (Ducheneaut and Moore, 2004). A wide range of tools, such as multimedia communication systems (Gaver et al, 1992;Bly et al, 1993), collaborative workspaces (Bently et al, 1997) and tools for synchronous collaboration (Begole et al, 2001;Sun and Chen, 2002), have attempted to overcome the problems of distribution by simulating aspects of co-presence. For instance, facilities for distributed work are now incorporated into personal computer operating systems as a matter of course.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive collection of research investigations surrounds such topics as distributed teams (Olson and Teasley, 1996;Grinter et al, 1999;Mark et al, 2003), computer-mediated communication (Galegher and Kraut, 1990;Markus, 1994;Bos et al, 2002), and more recent phenomena such as distributed gaming (Ducheneaut and Moore, 2004). A wide range of tools, such as multimedia communication systems (Gaver et al, 1992;Bly et al, 1993), collaborative workspaces (Bently et al, 1997) and tools for synchronous collaboration (Begole et al, 2001;Sun and Chen, 2002), have attempted to overcome the problems of distribution by simulating aspects of co-presence. For instance, facilities for distributed work are now incorporated into personal computer operating systems as a matter of course.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach is to develop generic application sharing environment and add the functions of singeruser applications to the environment [5]. It can make collaborative software having powerful functions.…”
Section: Related Research Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We made use of centralized architecture in the construction of the CARE-G net architecture, because the key advantage of centralized architectures is that they have no problem with data consistency because there is only one copy [18],Fig1.So this architecture can easy control concurrent [19]. But purely centralized systems impose strict What You See Is What I See (WYSIWIS), where the participants see exactly the same view of the shared application at the same time [20], which disallows independent work.…”
Section: Distributed Architecture Of Care-gmentioning
confidence: 99%