2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35038-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource sharing is sufficient for the emergence of division of labour

Abstract: Division of labour occurs in a broad range of organisms. Yet, how division of labour can emerge in the absence of pre-existing interindividual differences is poorly understood. Using a simple but realistic model, we show that in a group of initially identical individuals, division of labour emerges spontaneously if returning foragers share part of their resources with other group members. In the absence of resource sharing, individuals follow an activity schedule of alternating between foraging and other tasks… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strain that is not burdened by the plasmid is able to grow at a faster rate and helps to maintain the biomass of the population. This distribution is consistent with a more general definition of DOL, that DOL is simply the specialization of certain tasks by individuals within a group to improve overall function. These tasks are not limited to carrying out steps of a metabolic pathway of interest. Instead, these tasks can include any function carried out by a population, such as anabolizing a useful public good, degrading environmental sources of nutrients for public consumption, or maintaining the overall biomass of the population through optimized growth In the case of nitrogen fixation and nodulation, we propose that the DOL within the population is between cells that fix nitrogen or produce nodulation factors and cells that grow quickly.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The strain that is not burdened by the plasmid is able to grow at a faster rate and helps to maintain the biomass of the population. This distribution is consistent with a more general definition of DOL, that DOL is simply the specialization of certain tasks by individuals within a group to improve overall function. These tasks are not limited to carrying out steps of a metabolic pathway of interest. Instead, these tasks can include any function carried out by a population, such as anabolizing a useful public good, degrading environmental sources of nutrients for public consumption, or maintaining the overall biomass of the population through optimized growth In the case of nitrogen fixation and nodulation, we propose that the DOL within the population is between cells that fix nitrogen or produce nodulation factors and cells that grow quickly.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…More generally, this study questions the assumption that larger group size has promoted the evolution of biological complexity [2,[7][8][9]22]. While a positive correlation between cell/ caste type number and body/colony size has been widely recognized, several models of division of labour predict little or no direct relationship between these traits [16][17][18][19]. In the other major insect clade with eusocial species, Hymenoptera, analyses accounting for phylogenetic autocorrelation and other traits found no direct relationship between sterile caste polymorphism and colony size in stingless bees [15] and ants in general [14], although it does seem to occur in at least some ant clades [78,79].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Despite the evidence for a size-complexity rule, this relationship can depend on other factors [12,13] or simply not occur [14,15], and several models predict little or no direct relationship between division of labour and group size [16][17][18][19]. This suggests that, even when present, the sizecomplexity rule may be a false correlation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This mechanism causes some larvae to develop into large workers and some larvae into small workers, even in the absence of any systematic differences between individual larvae, although random differences in egg size can facilitate the differentiation of nutrition levels between larvae. A role of self-reinforcement for the emergence of castes has also been demonstrated in a non-evolutionary division of labour model, where individuals with high nutrition levels are dominant over individuals with lower nutrition levels and thus obtain more resources, leading to the emergence of distinct groups of malnourished foragers and well-nourished nurses [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%