2019
DOI: 10.1163/1568539x-00003533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resource use and defence by ruby-throated hummingbirds during stopover

Abstract: Many migrants must forage en route when fuel reserves are depleted and access to resources can be influenced by a variety of factors, including the sex, age, and current fuel stores of individuals, as well as resource availability. The objective of this study is to determine the factors that influence the use and defence of resources by migrating ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris). Our results illustrate that resource use: (1) is dependent on sex and resource defence, (2) decreases with fuel loa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contrasting effect of temperature during the month of departure in ruby‐crowned kinglets, when both fuel load and departure day behave as response variables may be a result of the positive association between temperature and bird abundance (Lepthien and Bock 1976). During warmer months, a higher abundance of individuals in the non‐breeding area could depress fuel loads (Moore and Yong 1991, Kelly et al 2002, Zenzal and Moore 2019) and, consequently, delay the initiation of migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contrasting effect of temperature during the month of departure in ruby‐crowned kinglets, when both fuel load and departure day behave as response variables may be a result of the positive association between temperature and bird abundance (Lepthien and Bock 1976). During warmer months, a higher abundance of individuals in the non‐breeding area could depress fuel loads (Moore and Yong 1991, Kelly et al 2002, Zenzal and Moore 2019) and, consequently, delay the initiation of migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of departure direction, most individuals left our edge site within 24 h of capture and, with our underlying assumption of less food at edge sites confirmed, individuals seeking to replenish energy stores would be more food limited and likely face increased competitor and predation pressure if remaining on the coast (Moore and Yong 1991, Aborn 1994, Woodrey and Moore 1997, Kelly et al 2002, Cimprich et al 2005, Cimprich and Moore 2006, Moore et al 2017, Zenzal and Moore 2019. A third of the departing individuals engaged in retreating movements consistent with locating more suitable stopover habitat, based on our food data -a behavior associated with the feeding state.…”
Section: Departing the Edgementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Migrants departing edge sites often select departure directions inconsistent with progress toward their breeding or non‐breeding destination (Alerstam 1978, Åkesson et al 1996, Åkesson 1999, Smolinsky et al 2013, Woodworth et al 2014, Deppe et al 2015, Nilsson and Sjöberg 2016). Coastlines, for example, are often characterized as habitat‐poor landscapes with high concentrations of migrants, which leads to reduced habitat quality (Abdollahi et al 2005, Mehlman et al 2005, Schaub et al 2008, Buler and Moore 2011, Lain et al 2017) in terms of increased predation pressure (Aborn 1994, Cimprich et al 2005, Woodworth et al 2014) and competition for food (Moore and Yong 1991, Zenzal and Moore 2019). Ultimately, if individuals are unable to adequately prepare for a long distance flight in edge habitats, then they will have a lower survival probability when attempting to cross the potential barrier (Erni et al 2003, Ward et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%