Word Knowledge and Word Usage 2020
DOI: 10.1515/9783110440577-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resources for mental lexicon research: A delicate ecosystem

Abstract: Resources are playing an ever-increasing role in current empirical investigations of the mental lexicon. Notwithstanding their diffusion and widespread application, lexical resources are often taken at face value, and there are limited efforts to better understand the dynamics and implications subtending resource developments, as well as the complex web of relations linking resources to each other. In the present chapter, we argue that describing these dynamics and relations is akin to investigating a complex … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For each prime and for each target, we computed their length (i.e., the number of letters in the letter string) and, as a measure of orthographic neighborhood (hence OrthoNeigh), we computed its OLD20 (i.e., the average OrthoDist between the letter string and its 20 closer neighbors; Yarkoni et al, 2008). In particular, the OrthoNeigh was computed using the vwr R package (Keuleers, 2013) and, to select the possible neighbors, we considered the 15,000 1 most frequent words in SUBTLEX-us (Brysbaert & New, 2009). The inclusion of these covariates ensures that our effects are not trivially determined by the orthographic overlap between prime and target.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each prime and for each target, we computed their length (i.e., the number of letters in the letter string) and, as a measure of orthographic neighborhood (hence OrthoNeigh), we computed its OLD20 (i.e., the average OrthoDist between the letter string and its 20 closer neighbors; Yarkoni et al, 2008). In particular, the OrthoNeigh was computed using the vwr R package (Keuleers, 2013) and, to select the possible neighbors, we considered the 15,000 1 most frequent words in SUBTLEX-us (Brysbaert & New, 2009). The inclusion of these covariates ensures that our effects are not trivially determined by the orthographic overlap between prime and target.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in Experiment 1, for each prime–target pair we computed the OrthoDist using the stringdist R package (van der Loo, 2014). For each prime and target, we also computed its length, OrthoNeigh with the vwr R package (Keuleers, 2013), and, for each target, SNeigh. In this case, we used the 15,000 most frequent words in the Italian SUBTLEX (http://crr.ugent.be/subtlex-it/).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that words with a large number of phonological neighbors are articulated with shorter durations than words with a small number of phonological neighbors (Gahl et al, 2012), for example. In this study, we calculated phonological neighborhood density based on the dictionary form of the word, by counting the words that differ in one segment from the word in question, using the R-package vwr (Keuleers, 2013). Neighborhood density varied between 1 and 30 (mean = 9.3, median = 8) for the words in our data set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, there were insufficient candidates in the LF-HF category to proceed ( n = 18) and this subset was dropped before matching. OLD20 estimates ( Yarkoni et al, 2008 ) were calculated for the remaining possible targets based on each of the corpora, using the OLD20 function in version 0.3 of the vwr package ( Keuleers, 2013 ). The OLD20 values from the SUBTLEX-CY and CEG corpora were very strongly correlated for words (ρ = .98).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%