2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12152-020-09434-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respect, Punishment and Mandatory Neurointerventions

Abstract: General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to these issues, some NE articles examine the ethical theory of retributivism, paying little attention to neuroscience-specific issues ( Caruso, 2020 ; Jeppsson, 2021 ), whereas others focus on the ethical treatment of psychopaths ( Morse, 2008 ; Gillett and Huang, 2013 ; Hübner and White, 2016 ). Finally, the moral justifiability of mandatory rehabilitation for criminals with neurotechnology—sometimes called “neurorehabilitation”—is assessed as a philosophical-ethical question ( Pereboom, 2020 ; Holmen, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these issues, some NE articles examine the ethical theory of retributivism, paying little attention to neuroscience-specific issues ( Caruso, 2020 ; Jeppsson, 2021 ), whereas others focus on the ethical treatment of psychopaths ( Morse, 2008 ; Gillett and Huang, 2013 ; Hübner and White, 2016 ). Finally, the moral justifiability of mandatory rehabilitation for criminals with neurotechnology—sometimes called “neurorehabilitation”—is assessed as a philosophical-ethical question ( Pereboom, 2020 ; Holmen, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%