2001
DOI: 10.1378/chest.119.3.867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory Changes in Aortic Blood Velocity as an Indicator of Fluid Responsiveness in Ventilated Patients With Septic Shock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
287
2
12

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 558 publications
(310 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
287
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Volume expansion is not without adverse effects, including pulmonary edema, worsening gas exchange, and hyperchloremic acidosis (1). It has been shown that not all patients in circulatory collapse respond to volume with improved cardiac function (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Moreover, patients with capillary leak may have total body volume overload and yet still benefit from augmented intravascular volume.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volume expansion is not without adverse effects, including pulmonary edema, worsening gas exchange, and hyperchloremic acidosis (1). It has been shown that not all patients in circulatory collapse respond to volume with improved cardiac function (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Moreover, patients with capillary leak may have total body volume overload and yet still benefit from augmented intravascular volume.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relying on pulmonary capillary wedge pressure to reflect ventricular volume, Perel et al [ 12 ] and Szold et al [15] showed that pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was related to SPV with both volume loading and phlebotomy in mechanically ventilated dogs. However, filling pressure cannot be used to reflect preload during mechanical ventilation (as is clear in Figure 4) or predict volume responsiveness [31][32][33][34]. Indeed, Denault et al [35] found that changes in systolic arterial pressure reflected changes in airway and intrathoracic pressure better than changes in echocardiographic enddiastolic area measurements in cardiac surgery patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with a responder variation of 20% [38]. Figure 4 shows clearly the mechanical ventilation induced variations in the aortic Doppler signal.…”
Section: Mechanical Ventilator Induced Intra-thoracic Pressure Changementioning
confidence: 93%