Objectives:To compare the intubating conditions of dexmedetomidine alone versus fentanyl -midazolam combination during AFOI
Methodology: Group-I patients (n=30) received dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg bolus infusion over 10 minutes, followed by infusion of 0.1 µg/kg/hr
titrated to 0.7 µg/kg/hr whereas Group-II patients (n=30) received i.v fentanyl 2µg/kg bolus followed by midazolam infusion of 0.02-0.1mg/kg/hr
until they were adequately sedated i.e. Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS) of 3 .Intraoperatively Total Comfort Score, 5 point FOI score was noted and
Questionnaire assessment was done 24 hours after surgery.
Results: During preoxygenation, the mean TCS was not statistically signicant different between the two groups but during FOS and during
intubation, the mean TCS was lower in group-1than group-2and the difference between the two groups was statistically signicant.(p<0.05).
Signicant differences in the patient's reaction to tube were found during FOS and after intubation between the two groups with lower reaction in
dexmedetomidine group(p≤0.05). During follow-up assessment 24 hours after the surgical procedure, the dexmedetomidine group patients judged
their sedation more positively and were having less pain and discomfort during the procedure than fentanyl plus midazolam patients.
Conclusion: The use of dexmedetomidine at 1mcg/kg bolus over 10 minutes, with maintenance rates of 0.1-0.7 μg/kg/hr offer better tolerance,
preservation of a patent airway and spontaneous ventilation, while maintaining hemodynamic stability during AFOI.