1987
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.2063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory effects of work in retail food stores. I. Methodology and exposure assignments.

Abstract: WEGMAN DH , SMITH TJ , EISEN EA, GREAVES lA , FINE LJ , CHELTON CS. Respirat ory effects of work in retail food stores: I Methodology and exposure assignment s. Scand J Work Environ Health 13 (1987) 203-208. This study was designed to examine whether retail food store employees have an unusual prevalence or incidence of respirat ory symptoms or pulmonary function abnormalities attributable to their work environment. The methodology and development of exposure assignments are presented. Employees from 75 super… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional reports of acute illness led to the initiation of a study to examine the possibility that long-term respiratory health effect s may result from working in such environments. Details of the study protocol, subjects, and methods have been described elsewhere (9). A brief summary follows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional reports of acute illness led to the initiation of a study to examine the possibility that long-term respiratory health effect s may result from working in such environments. Details of the study protocol, subjects, and methods have been described elsewhere (9). A brief summary follows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal exposure variable evaluated in the baseline study was an estimate of the cumulative exposure to emissions from wrapping operations detailed elsewhere (14).…”
Section: Environmental Exposuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was designed to examine the prevalence of respiratory symptoms and to characterize both the cross-sectional status and longitudinal change in pulmonary function associated with employment. The methods and results for respiratory symptoms have been reported separately (13,14). The findings for pulmonary function are given in the present report.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%