Pediatric and Neonatal Mechanical Ventilation 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01219-8_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory Mechanics in the Mechanically Ventilated Patient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our study did not prove this. On the contrary, the results suggest that the C w /C L ratio, especially before hernia repair, can be similar or lower than in neonates with healthy lungs (3-6) 7,[31][32][33][34] . It is an important issue that should be studied and explained in the future, especially in the context of the C decrease after operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, our study did not prove this. On the contrary, the results suggest that the C w /C L ratio, especially before hernia repair, can be similar or lower than in neonates with healthy lungs (3-6) 7,[31][32][33][34] . It is an important issue that should be studied and explained in the future, especially in the context of the C decrease after operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…From the point of view of a neonatal ventilation, the ratio between chest wall compliance and lung compliance (C w /C L ) is unfavourable, comparing to the older population. It amounts up to 3-6 in infants with healthy lungs [30][31][32] , whereas it www.nature.com/scientificreports/ is about 1 in healthy adults. As a result, an increase in tidal volume requires higher pressures in neonates than in adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exogenous surfactant (200 mg/kg poractant alfa) was administered at 10 min. Total, tidal, elastic-dynamic (elas) and resistive (res) MP were calculated for tidal inflations minutely to 5 min and then at 10, 15, 30 and 90 min using the geometric method [ 7 ]. That is, MP total and MP tidal were calculated from the area of the airway pressure–volume loop multiplied with 0.098*respiratory rate, with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) subtracted for MP tidal [ 8 ].…”
Section: Hypothesis-generating Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%