Respiratory support withdrawal in intensive care units: families, physicians and nurses views on two hypothetical clinical scenarios

Abstract

IntroductionEvidence suggests that dying patients' physical and emotional suffering is inadequately treated in intensive care units. Although there are recommendations regarding decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapy, deciding on withdrawal of life support is difficult, and it is also difficult to decide who should participate in this decision.MethodsWe distributed a self-administered questionnaire in 13 adult intensive care units (ICUs) assessing the attitudes of physicians and nurses regarding end-of-life decisions. Family members from a medical-surgical ICU in a tertiary cancer hospital were also invited to participate. Questions were related to two hypothetical clinical scenarios, one with a competent patient and the other with an incompetent patient, asking whether the ventilator treatment should be withdrawn and about who should make this decision.ResultsPhysicians (155) and nurses (204) of 12 ICUs agreed to take part in this study, along with 300 family members. The vast majority of families (78.6%), physicians (74.8%) and nurses (75%) want to discuss end-of-life decisions with competent patients. Most of the physicians and nurses desire family involvement in end-of-life decisions. Physicians are more likely to propose withdrawal of the ventilator with competent patients than with incompetent patients (74.8% × 60.7%, P = 0.028). When the patient was incompetent, physicians (34.8%) were significantly less prone than nurses (23.0%) and families (14.7%) to propose decisions regarding withdrawal of the ventilator support (P < 0.001).ConclusionsPhysicians, nurses and families recommended limiting life-support therapy with terminally ill patients and favored family participation. In decisions concerning an incompetent patient, physicians were more likely to maintain the therapy.

Terminalidade da vida em terapia intensiva: posicionamento dos familiares sobre ortotanásia

“…Recent research conducted in a number of Brazilian hospitals has shown that in cases where patients are unable to take part in end-of-life care discussions due to their clinical condition, most physicians are less likely to disagree with nurses and family members. (24) This conclusion agrees with that of another study that was conducted in the US. (25) Several studies have stressed the relevance of medical team and patient/family member communication.…”

Patient and family involvement in adult critical and intensive care settings: a scoping review

“…During the course of a patient's stay in the ICU, family members must often assume responsibility over health‐related decision making, including choices about diagnostics, treatment and therapeutic care. Family member involvement in decision making was the subject of 7 quantitative and 10 qualitative studies . Amongst the qualitative studies, five use in‐depth interviews to explore how surrogate‐decision‐makers participate in decision making around life support .…”

Association between education in EOL care and variability in EOL practice: a survey of ICU physicians

“…Another significant finding from our study is that what physicians said they would do differed in 44% of cases from what they believed was best for the patient. Despite these concerns, withdrawal and withholding of LST are increasingly reported EOL practices in Brazil [3], and in some circumstances, even desired by families [38]. Legal concerns, followed by team and societal opinion, were the most common obstacles to following the course of action believed to be best.…”