2020
DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respiratory Variation in Aortic Blood Flow Velocity in Hemodynamically Unstable, Ventilated Neonates: A Pilot Study of Fluid Responsiveness

Abstract: To assess whether respiratory variation in aortic blood flow peak velocity can predict preload responsiveness in mechanically ventilated and hemodynamically unstable neonates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, serial echocardiography may help to better titrate the dose of vasoactive drugs or re ne other aspects of hemodynamic management such as potential deleterious effect of mechanical ventilation. [41] In our sensitivity analysis excluding infants exposed to hemodynamic interventions that may have been triggered by the use of early ECHO, the risk of IVH or death was not lower in the intervention group, which suggests that the sum of cointerventions and not only inotropes played a role in the observed reduction of IVH. Notably, the main difference between the present study and previous LSBF trials is that we assessed the effect of exposure to echocardiography instead of exposure to inotropes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In addition, serial echocardiography may help to better titrate the dose of vasoactive drugs or re ne other aspects of hemodynamic management such as potential deleterious effect of mechanical ventilation. [41] In our sensitivity analysis excluding infants exposed to hemodynamic interventions that may have been triggered by the use of early ECHO, the risk of IVH or death was not lower in the intervention group, which suggests that the sum of cointerventions and not only inotropes played a role in the observed reduction of IVH. Notably, the main difference between the present study and previous LSBF trials is that we assessed the effect of exposure to echocardiography instead of exposure to inotropes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Nevertheless, this study found that whether the cutoff value of 10% or 15% was used, it did not significantly impact the sensitivity or specificity of the test. Regarding concurrent medication use, there were 11 studies which used vasoactive drugs such as dopamine, milrinone, adrenaline, and norepinephrine (18–20, 23, 24, 26–31). Inotropic and vasoactive drugs could affect contractility of the heart, the systemic vascular resistance, the pulmonic vascular resistance, and the venous return, depending on the mechanisms of action of each drug (35–38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systolic blood pressure (SBP) response was discussed in even fewer articles (10/62, 16%), and only 20% of these articles (2/10, 20%) found a significant increase in SBP post-bolus. Only three articles assessed clinical response outside of blood pressure (n = 3/62, 5%) (39)(40)(41). Of this small sample, clinical response was assessed only through laboratory values (lactate, central venous oxygenation, base excess).…”
Section: Descriptive Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%