1992
DOI: 10.1179/bjdd.1992.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respite Care for Children With Mental Handicap: Service Evaluation and Profile of Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However this study found that children who never/rarely dressed themselves or took care of their own continence needs were no more likely to use respite care, nor were children who presented with challenging behaviour any more likely to use respite care than children without these behaviours. The second finding is also inconsistent with former research suggesting that children who present with challenging behaviours are more frequent users of respite care (Grant & McGrath 1990;Jawed et al 1992;Marc & MacDonald 1988). When reflecting on why children with substantial personal care needs were not more likely to use respite care than their more independent peers it is important to consider that carers are often 'arbiters of standards' and require confirmation from providers that services will maintain the dignity of the cared-for person before accepting a service (Twigg & Atkin 1994).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However this study found that children who never/rarely dressed themselves or took care of their own continence needs were no more likely to use respite care, nor were children who presented with challenging behaviour any more likely to use respite care than children without these behaviours. The second finding is also inconsistent with former research suggesting that children who present with challenging behaviours are more frequent users of respite care (Grant & McGrath 1990;Jawed et al 1992;Marc & MacDonald 1988). When reflecting on why children with substantial personal care needs were not more likely to use respite care than their more independent peers it is important to consider that carers are often 'arbiters of standards' and require confirmation from providers that services will maintain the dignity of the cared-for person before accepting a service (Twigg & Atkin 1994).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…However this study found that children who never/rarely dressed themselves or took care of their own continence needs were no more likely to use respite care, nor were children who presented with challenging behaviour any more likely to use respite care than children without these behaviours. The second finding is also inconsistent with former research suggesting that children who present with challenging behaviours are more frequent users of respite care (Grant & McGrath 1990; Jawed et al. 1992; Marc & MacDonald 1988).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…The literature on this issue is conflicting. Salisbury (1990) found that mothers of female children with disabilities were more likely to use respite services, while Jawed et al . 's (1992) findings were similar to those of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%