2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11524-006-9107-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respondent-Driven Sampling in Participatory Research Contexts: Participant-Driven Recruitment

Abstract: This article reports on the use of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) in participatory and community-based research. Participant-driven recruitment (PDR) retains all of the analytic capabilities of RDS while enhancing the role of respondents in framing research questions, instrument development, data interpretation, and other aspects of the research process. Merging the capabilities of RDS with participatory research methods, PDR creates new opportunities for engaging community members in research addressing soc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hired six peer researcher assistants who were internally displaced youth; they included three young men (aged 18, 20, 23) and three young women (aged 18, 21, 24). We used peer-driven sampling methods [30,31], whereby peer researcher assistants invited youth from their social networks to participate in FG using snowball sampling and word-of-mouth techniques. Peer-driven sampling methods are appropriate for contexts where potential participants experience marginalization and populations may be harder to access [30,31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We hired six peer researcher assistants who were internally displaced youth; they included three young men (aged 18, 20, 23) and three young women (aged 18, 21, 24). We used peer-driven sampling methods [30,31], whereby peer researcher assistants invited youth from their social networks to participate in FG using snowball sampling and word-of-mouth techniques. Peer-driven sampling methods are appropriate for contexts where potential participants experience marginalization and populations may be harder to access [30,31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used peer-driven sampling methods [30,31], whereby peer researcher assistants invited youth from their social networks to participate in FG using snowball sampling and word-of-mouth techniques. Peer-driven sampling methods are appropriate for contexts where potential participants experience marginalization and populations may be harder to access [30,31]. To reduce bias we hired 6 peer researcher assistants of different ages, residence locations, and education levels, and limited to 10 the number of participants each peer researcher assistant could invite.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….." (p. 1). Although participatory research is noted for its involvement of participants at every stage of the research (Tiffany, 2006), Cornwall and Jewkes (1995) suggested that the degree of participants' involvement can vary depending on the aim of the research. In this study, participants were actively involved in data generation through the telling their stories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies in the United States have also used RDS to develop samples of people who trade sex (Curtis et al, 2008;Williamson & Perdue, 2012). Tiffany (2006) has demonstrated that RDS is highly compatible with participatory research in a synthesis she refers to as participant-driven recruitment (PDR). PDR capitalizes on common ground of RDS and participatory approaches in local knowledge, peer-to-peer recruitment, and social networks (Tiffany, 2006).…”
Section: Sampling Sex Trading To Build Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meditation practice also helped me sustain equanimity in the face of adversity and setbacks. The process articulated what I now know is a strong AR principle to seek contextual and appropriate meanings of validity and rigor using the best possible research methods (Greenwood, 2008;Stringer, 2007;Tiffany, 2006). We were not able to use statistical modeling in our sampling methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%