2002
DOI: 10.1080/10361140220148160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Respondent Understanding of the 1999 Referendum Question on a Reform of the New Zealand Justice System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the New Zealand adult criminal justice system is regarded as a key example of populist punitiveness: 'the notion of politicians tapping into, and using for their own purposes, what they believe to be the public's generally punitive stance' (Bottoms, 1995: 40). Beginning with a citizen-initiated referendum in 1999 (Gendall et al, 2002), the adult criminal justice system has followed a punitive course (Pratt, 2007(Pratt, , 2008Pratt and Clark, 2005). The burgeoning prison population illustrates this well.…”
Section: Preserving the Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the New Zealand adult criminal justice system is regarded as a key example of populist punitiveness: 'the notion of politicians tapping into, and using for their own purposes, what they believe to be the public's generally punitive stance' (Bottoms, 1995: 40). Beginning with a citizen-initiated referendum in 1999 (Gendall et al, 2002), the adult criminal justice system has followed a punitive course (Pratt, 2007(Pratt, , 2008Pratt and Clark, 2005). The burgeoning prison population illustrates this well.…”
Section: Preserving the Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a particular catalyst for punitiveness in the adult system was a public initiated referendum in 1999 organized by an individual whose mother had been the victim of a violent crime (Ministry of Justice, 2011). The referendum posed the question “should there be a reform of our justice system placing greater emphasis on the needs of victims, providing restitution and compensation for them and imposing minimum sentences and hard labour for all serious offenders?” Of the respondents, 92% answered this rather leading question in the affirmative (Gendall, Hoek, & Willis, 2002). This was a driver of a volatile and reactive legislative period, as discussed above.…”
Section: Mode Of Legislative and Policy Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%