2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13081541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responding to Large-Scale Forest Damage in an Alpine Environment with Remote Sensing, Machine Learning, and Web-GIS

Abstract: This paper reports a semi-automated workflow for detection and quantification of forest damage from windthrow in an Alpine region, in particular from the Vaia storm in October 2018. A web-GIS platform allows to select the damaged area by drawing polygons; several vegetation indices (VIs) are automatically calculated using remote sensing data (Sentinel-2A) and tested to identify the more suitable ones for quantifying forest damage using cross-validation with ground-truth data. Results show that the mean value o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These tools are a valid and well-established source of data for evaluating earth surface characteristics. Active sensors (e.g., laser scanner, radar) can provide useful 3D information on forest structures and are able to extract tree size and spatial arrangement [12], while passive sensors can be used to infer vegetation status and forest cover [13]. For example, active Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) sensors emit a polarized signal at wavelengths in the microwave range of the electromagnetic spectrum and record the backscattered intensity at different polarizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools are a valid and well-established source of data for evaluating earth surface characteristics. Active sensors (e.g., laser scanner, radar) can provide useful 3D information on forest structures and are able to extract tree size and spatial arrangement [12], while passive sensors can be used to infer vegetation status and forest cover [13]. For example, active Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) sensors emit a polarized signal at wavelengths in the microwave range of the electromagnetic spectrum and record the backscattered intensity at different polarizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these solutions are key enabling technologies for Earth Observation. They have been applied by authors in the context of forest monitoring, in particular related to forest applications, like biomass estimation using different sensors (Pirotti et al, 2014), damage assessment from wind throw using ad-hoc indices from remote sensing data (Piragnolo et al, 2021) and comparing opendata sources to assess damaged areas (Laurin et al, 2020;Vaglio Laurin et al, 2016) or mapping wetlends with support of active remote sensing (LaRocque et al, 2020) or even to support spatialization of agricultural practices (Pagliacci et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olmo et al [22] showed with a multitemporal analysis based on vegetation indices that, starting from April 2019, it was possible to observe a deviation of reflectance values for damaged and undamaged areas comparing to the years before the storm. Piragnolo et al [23] showed that the multitemporal analysis of vegetation indices calculated on the S2 imagery are useful to predict severity classes of damaged areas using aggregational statistics of VIs as input to random forest machine learning algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these studies use dense Landsat or MODIS TS as input data [40,46], while, the use of S2 and CCDC algorithm to map forest areas damaged by windstorms is limited [37]. Many recent studies on VAIA windstorm underlined that S2 is adequate to detect windstorm since S2 program offers innovative features for forest remote sensing by combining high spatial resolution (i.e., 13 bands, from 0.443 to 2.190 µm with the visible (i.e., R, G, B,) and the near infrared bands at 10-m spatial resolution and four red-edge bands at 20-m spatial resolution), wide coverage and a quick revisit time (i.e., every 5 days after the launch of Sentinel-2B satellite in 2017) [15,18,22,23]. However, they considered only a small portion of the area hit by VAIA windstorm and no-ones provided an estimation of damaged area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%