2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response and recovery of gibel carp from subchronic oral administration of aflatoxin B1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
36
1
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
9
36
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the present study, no fish died after 24 weeks of AFB 1 exposure, nor did we observe any external or behavioral changes such as regurgitation of feed, lethargy, loss of equilibrium and rapid opercular movement. Similar results have been reported in previous researches with channel catfish (Jantrarotai and Lovell, 1990) and gibel carp (Huang et al, 2011). The differences among fish species concerning their sensitivity for AFB 1 were mentioned by Ngethe et al (1993) who concluded that there are species differences in the metabolism of AFB 1 in the liver and affinity of AFB 1 -derived metabolites to hepatic macromolecules.…”
Section: Afb 1 Levels In the Experimental Dietssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in the present study, no fish died after 24 weeks of AFB 1 exposure, nor did we observe any external or behavioral changes such as regurgitation of feed, lethargy, loss of equilibrium and rapid opercular movement. Similar results have been reported in previous researches with channel catfish (Jantrarotai and Lovell, 1990) and gibel carp (Huang et al, 2011). The differences among fish species concerning their sensitivity for AFB 1 were mentioned by Ngethe et al (1993) who concluded that there are species differences in the metabolism of AFB 1 in the liver and affinity of AFB 1 -derived metabolites to hepatic macromolecules.…”
Section: Afb 1 Levels In the Experimental Dietssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Deng et al (2010) reported 13.3 μg kg −1 of AFB 1 in soybean meal, 1.6 μg kg −1 in fish meal and 62.6 μg kg −1 in peanut meal, respectively and the contaminated ingredients make the control diet with a high concentration of AFB 1 up to 19 μg kg − 1 . Several other publications also reported that AFB 1 was detected in control diet even without any supplementation of AFB 1 (Boonyaratpalin et al, 2001;Han et al, 2009;Huang et al, 2011). -Banna et al (1992) reported that fish fed with a 0.2 mg AFB kg −1 diet had 16.7% mortality.…”
Section: Afb 1 Levels In the Experimental Dietsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to the current result, Alpsoy et al [30] found that in human lymphocytes, AFB1 significantly decreased the activities of SOD. While, Huang et al [32] showed that, the activities of SOD were not significantly different in the AFB1 exposed groups compared to the controls. These discrepancies might be due to difference in the concentrations and the uptake route of AFB1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFB1 in muscles in all groups were all below the safety limit of 0.005 mg/kg wet weight. These results show that AFB1 exposure to about 2 mg/kg diet have no apparent effect on the growth and liver function of gibel carp, but it would harm fertility of fish (Huang et al, 2011). Raghavan (2011) studied the toxicity of aflatoxin B1 in juvenile hybrid sturgeon Acipenserruthenus baeri.…”
Section: Afb1 Residues In Fishmentioning
confidence: 99%