2016
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.166280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response Assessment Criteria and Their Applications in Lymphoma: Part 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial 2007 International Harmonization Project tumor response classifications have been updated, first with the 2009 Deauville 5-point scale (D5PS) and more recently by the 2014 Lugano Criteria, which incorporates the D5PS [28]. This standardization has allowed for unified, comparable response assessment and lead to numerous studies, across various lymphoma subtypes (including Hodgkin lymphoma), firmly establishing the prognostic importance of post treatment 18 F-FDG-PET/CT response and allowing for response adaptive therapies [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial 2007 International Harmonization Project tumor response classifications have been updated, first with the 2009 Deauville 5-point scale (D5PS) and more recently by the 2014 Lugano Criteria, which incorporates the D5PS [28]. This standardization has allowed for unified, comparable response assessment and lead to numerous studies, across various lymphoma subtypes (including Hodgkin lymphoma), firmly establishing the prognostic importance of post treatment 18 F-FDG-PET/CT response and allowing for response adaptive therapies [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer immunotherapies often induce massive immune cell infiltration and consequently cause pronounced inflammation in tumors, increasing local metabolism levels (49). This inflammatory phenomenon presents tremendous challenges for the traditional therapeutic response evaluation methods, which often use a high metabolic rate as an indicator for cancer progression (50,51). For DLBCL, immunotherapies such as checkpoint inhibitors (15) and CAR-T-cell therapy (16) are rapidly advancing in clinical development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of uptake above background for a lesion that was clearly seen pre‐therapy is termed a “complete metabolic response.” Additionally, some schemes will use a qualitative visual FDG uptake scale. For example, in the popular Deauville scale devised for lymphoma response evaluation, FDG uptake is assessed relative to normal body structures as follows: Deauville 1: FDG uptake at or local below background level Deauville 2: FDG uptake at or below blood pool level Deauville 3: FDG uptake at or below normal liver level Deauville 4: FDG uptake greater than normal liver level Deauville 5: FDG uptake much greater than normal liver level …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FDG PET/CT is widely used in the clinical management of lymphoma both to stage patients with aggressive and FDG‐avid intermediate‐grade lymphomas and to assess response to treatment . The application of FDG PET/CT for following treatment response in lymphoma was motivated by the high sensitivity of FDG PET for the aggressive histologies such as diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Hodgkins lymphoma (HL) and specificity for active disease in the post‐treatment setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation