2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2886-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response biomarkers: re-envisioning the approach to tailoring drug therapy for cancer

Abstract: BackgroundThe rapidly expanding arsenal of chemotherapeutic agents approved in the past 5 years represents significant progress in the field. However, this poses a challenge for oncologists to choose which drug or combination of drugs is best for any individual. Because only a fraction of patients respond to any drug, efforts have been made to devise strategies to personalize care. The majority of efforts have involved development of predictive biomarkers. While there are notable successes, there are no predic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results also may have been affected by the duration of treatment, although eight dogs did receive treatment for ≥3 weeks. As doxycycline would be predicted to alter cell signaling and thus have cytostatic rather than cytotoxic activity, clinical response criteria developed for the evaluation of cytotoxic drugs may not be the ideal way to monitor drug efficacy, and other biomarkers of response and efficacy should be considered in future research ( 51 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results also may have been affected by the duration of treatment, although eight dogs did receive treatment for ≥3 weeks. As doxycycline would be predicted to alter cell signaling and thus have cytostatic rather than cytotoxic activity, clinical response criteria developed for the evaluation of cytotoxic drugs may not be the ideal way to monitor drug efficacy, and other biomarkers of response and efficacy should be considered in future research ( 51 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the concept of targeted therapeutics came in vogue, efforts were made to gain a better understanding of tumor biology and to identify tumor-specific therapeutic targets. In fact, most of these targets are also predictive biomarkers that give us information on whether a certain therapy would be beneficial to one patient but not to another [ 3 ]. Furthermore, acquiring a deep understanding of the signaling pathways in which critical targets are involved is fundamental to dig out molecular mechanisms that will likely inform us on response—or resistance—to therapy [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be applied to improve conventional biomarker and diagnostic measures, and provide better informed, personalized patient-specific recommendations. Using biomarkers to inform chemotherapeutic choices has remained difficult, even in cases where the measured marker is known to be related to a drug target [ 46 48 ]. This may be partly due to cancer heterogeneity, which limits the inferences that can be drawn from using a single, or a small number, of features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%