2018
DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response: Concerns with conclusions in the article by Sherwood et al ‘Key differences between 13 KRAS mutation detection technologies and their relevance for clinical practice’

Abstract: Click here and here to see the linked papers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method of transparently processing OpenFlow messages is not particularly new. Similar techniques are used for network virtualization [119][120][121], to realize hypervisor functionality [122], to interoperate with non-SDN legacy net-work equipment [123] or to transparently deal with flow table limitations [124]. The novelty of our approach is that developers can easily create and deploy their own translation application for every possible control channel protocol, without extensive changes to the network operating system or the control apps, which simplifies rapid prototyping and research work.…”
Section: Conceptual Limits Of Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of transparently processing OpenFlow messages is not particularly new. Similar techniques are used for network virtualization [119][120][121], to realize hypervisor functionality [122], to interoperate with non-SDN legacy net-work equipment [123] or to transparently deal with flow table limitations [124]. The novelty of our approach is that developers can easily create and deploy their own translation application for every possible control channel protocol, without extensive changes to the network operating system or the control apps, which simplifies rapid prototyping and research work.…”
Section: Conceptual Limits Of Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%