2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-010-0875-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response definition criteria for ELISPOT assays revisited

Abstract: No consensus has been reached on how to determine if an immune response has been detected based on raw data from an ELISPOT assay. The goal of this paper is to enable investigators to understand and readily implement currently available methods for response determination. We describe empirical and statistical approaches, identifying the strengths and limitations of each approach to allow readers to rationally select and apply a scientifically sound method appropriate to their specific laboratory setting. Five … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
169
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
169
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For multiple group comparisons, nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn multiple-comparison tests were used. For ELISpot data, statistical significance was evaluated with the DFR(eq) script (20). Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For multiple group comparisons, nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn multiple-comparison tests were used. For ELISpot data, statistical significance was evaluated with the DFR(eq) script (20). Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined responses using empirical response methods: positive wells were required to contain a minimum of 10 spots/2 Â 10 5 cells and have at least 3-fold more spots than negative control wells. These criteria have been shown to yield very low false positive rates (36).…”
Section: Ifn-g Elispotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spots were counted using an ELISpot 4.0 reader (AID Diagnostika GmbH, San Diego, CA). The positive responses to each antigen were measured by an empirical rule (ER) which defines a positive response as an at least 2-fold increase of spot number in the experimental wells over the background with a minimum threshold of 5 spots per 100,000 PBMCs in the experimental wells (24). An M. tuberculosis ESAT-6-specific positive response was defined as spots appearing in M. tuberculosis ESAT-6/CFP-10 and either M. tuberculosis ESAT-6 1-57 or M. tuberculosis ESAT-6 55-95 stimulation alongside the positive response to anti-CD3 antibody.…”
Section: Ifn-␥ Elispot Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%