2015
DOI: 10.1080/17533171.2015.1063832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response: “Goodbye Miss Lara!” or what’s Slavery got to do with it? Regeneration through Violence inDjango Unchained?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tarantino's relationship to structural racism in the present is also at the center of Dunham's challenge to the film: “Tarantino unwittingly undermines his own pretensions to social consciousness, producing instead a film that reflects and reproduces the ignorance, strategic silence, and White guilt surrounding America's ongoing history of slavery and racism” (402). In contrast, Joi Carr sees the film as a “challenge [to] the pernicious imagery of black inferiority” (38) and Erica L. Ball, while critiquing the film's ahistoricism and neoliberal sympathies, argues that it provides a genuine “critique of the cinematic plantation tradition” (315). Veronica Fitzpatrick understands “[the film's] articulation of slavery's wrongness and cruelty [as] profound and revolutionary” (319).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tarantino's relationship to structural racism in the present is also at the center of Dunham's challenge to the film: “Tarantino unwittingly undermines his own pretensions to social consciousness, producing instead a film that reflects and reproduces the ignorance, strategic silence, and White guilt surrounding America's ongoing history of slavery and racism” (402). In contrast, Joi Carr sees the film as a “challenge [to] the pernicious imagery of black inferiority” (38) and Erica L. Ball, while critiquing the film's ahistoricism and neoliberal sympathies, argues that it provides a genuine “critique of the cinematic plantation tradition” (315). Veronica Fitzpatrick understands “[the film's] articulation of slavery's wrongness and cruelty [as] profound and revolutionary” (319).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%